Any long term reader of this blog, or attendee at Shawnee City Council Meetings knows about council member Dawn Kuhn's penchant for long winded diatribes.
If something can be said in 2 minutes, she'll take five. If it can be said in five, she'll take fifteen. Ironically, she is the first to complain about other people wasting council time. A review of full minutes and/or audio files would show exactly what percentage of "talk time" she takes. On top of that, she has on many occasions complained about the lack of civility on the council. Yet, IMHO she can be one of the most uncivil of the members. She tries to do it with molasses, sometimes, but can't hide it. Other times she is just uncivil straight up.
WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
If you would like to comment about this post, or any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com
Sunday, July 14, 2013
Tuesday, July 09, 2013
Jeff Vaught is Against Open Government
At the 6/18/13 council committee the item came up regarding the possibility of council members getting tablets and whether or not they should be city owned or should the council members get an allowance to provide their own.
Jeff Vaught apparently would rather have an allowance. Listen to him as he explains why he would rather have an allowance. And this coming from a man who in his campaign literature said he was a "patriot". Vaught's statement clearly indicates he is against open government. See and hear it for yourself.
If you are going to conduct city business on a tablet/iPad be prepared for the info being made available to the public. Or, what does Jeff Vaught want to hide?
"I would just say, I would like to, um, and if we do something I would rather have an allowance than the city would provide us and that’s because you know when we say ipad I’d rather say tablet because I would rather have an android device than an ipad but, and then also because it’s something that I would rather own myself and not be subject to the requests that, you know, give it up because someone else wants to see what’s on it because it’s a city owned device. Unfortunate(ly) I think there’s certain people that would make it their hobby to request that letter every two months to see what’s on their devices so, I think I would rather have an allowance."
WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
If you would like to comment about this post, or any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com
Jeff Vaught apparently would rather have an allowance. Listen to him as he explains why he would rather have an allowance. And this coming from a man who in his campaign literature said he was a "patriot". Vaught's statement clearly indicates he is against open government. See and hear it for yourself.
If you are going to conduct city business on a tablet/iPad be prepared for the info being made available to the public. Or, what does Jeff Vaught want to hide?
"I would just say, I would like to, um, and if we do something I would rather have an allowance than the city would provide us and that’s because you know when we say ipad I’d rather say tablet because I would rather have an android device than an ipad but, and then also because it’s something that I would rather own myself and not be subject to the requests that, you know, give it up because someone else wants to see what’s on it because it’s a city owned device. Unfortunate(ly) I think there’s certain people that would make it their hobby to request that letter every two months to see what’s on their devices so, I think I would rather have an allowance."
If you would like to comment about this post, or any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com
Sunday, July 07, 2013
Be Careful With Cigarette Butts
Saturday morning I flew back to KCI after spending a week with my kids and grandkids on the UP of Michigan. Beautiful country. Highs in the 70's and lows at night 40's - 50's.
Anyway, as I'm deplaning I turn my cell phone back on, and just as I approach bag claim the voice mail tone comes on. I look at the screen and it's from the apartment complex I live at. Hmmmm, well I listen to the VM. Apparently at around 2:15AM someone tossed a lit cigarette on my balcony. Whether it came from a careless smoker on another balcony or one walking by flipping it in the air, it started a fire on the balcony. Fortunately somebody saw the flames, called the FD and they responded rather quickly. So quickly, that the only damage was to the balcony. No structural or interior damage occurred. And, more importantly no people were hurt.
A big thank you to the crew from station 71. You folks are good
Carelessly disposing of cigarette butts can be disastrous whether it's a single family or multi family structure. A wooden deck on a single family unit can go up in flames just as easily.
Folks, if you're going to smoke outside on a deck, patio, balcony or whatever, have a coffee can filled with either water or sand, and use it.
WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
If you would like to comment about this post, any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com
Anyway, as I'm deplaning I turn my cell phone back on, and just as I approach bag claim the voice mail tone comes on. I look at the screen and it's from the apartment complex I live at. Hmmmm, well I listen to the VM. Apparently at around 2:15AM someone tossed a lit cigarette on my balcony. Whether it came from a careless smoker on another balcony or one walking by flipping it in the air, it started a fire on the balcony. Fortunately somebody saw the flames, called the FD and they responded rather quickly. So quickly, that the only damage was to the balcony. No structural or interior damage occurred. And, more importantly no people were hurt.
A big thank you to the crew from station 71. You folks are good
Carelessly disposing of cigarette butts can be disastrous whether it's a single family or multi family structure. A wooden deck on a single family unit can go up in flames just as easily.
Folks, if you're going to smoke outside on a deck, patio, balcony or whatever, have a coffee can filled with either water or sand, and use it.
WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
If you would like to comment about this post, any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com
Thursday, June 27, 2013
WARNING!!!!!! Read at Your Own Risk
WARNING!!!!! Please be advised that according to the city manager of Shawnee, KS, local blogs may contain bad or misinformation. That is part of the justification she is using to create a new public information officer position which could cost up to $70K per year.
Therefore, when you read anything on this blog, remember, the information here may be bad or created to misinform. It is suggested that people take the information here and do their own research to verify or disprove any of the statements contained herein.
We realize that we are not like the mayor, the city manager, or certain members of the city council. These folks never provide bad or misinformation to the public. The information provided by them is always accurate, spot on and never misleading. Hmmmm, I wonder if this last paragraph would be considered bad or misinformation? :-) :-)
If you would like to comment about this post, any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com
Therefore, when you read anything on this blog, remember, the information here may be bad or created to misinform. It is suggested that people take the information here and do their own research to verify or disprove any of the statements contained herein.
We realize that we are not like the mayor, the city manager, or certain members of the city council. These folks never provide bad or misinformation to the public. The information provided by them is always accurate, spot on and never misleading. Hmmmm, I wonder if this last paragraph would be considered bad or misinformation? :-) :-)
If you would like to comment about this post, any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com
Monday, June 24, 2013
Keep 'Em in the Dark...............
Keep who in the dark? Well, the people of Shawnee, that's who.
Now, why do I say this? Easy.....at last week's committee meeting the agenda packets again (as usual) did not include all the info.
See, what happens is the city posts an agenda packet on line, and then the same thing is available at city hall before the meeting. But, not all of the info is in there. The full spectrum of information which is going to be discussed with the documents is left off. In this case, it was more items concerning the proposed budget. Very similar situation as to the one I posted about on 5/26 below entitled "Open Government??? Yeah Right!!!!" (scroll down to read it if you'd like).
Now, sometimes the info is included in the minutes packet, after the fact, and that can be weeks after the meeting.
I'm waiting to hear councilmember Jeff Vaught start pontificating about how the city received an award for open government. If one reads the basis for that, it concerns mostly a web site with links to certain items.............but it does not include a review of the completeness of those items or their depth. Part of this was covered in my post of 9/14/2012 "Shedding Light on Sunshine Review" http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2012/09/shedding-light-on-sunshine-review.html The city got its high rating just when the topic of going back to full meeting minutes came up for a vote. It's also interesting, that as a result of a KORA request, we found out that there was a flurry of emails back and forth for a few days preceding that award, (and the vote on the minutes) with the city pushing to see what it had to do to upgrade its rating. Coincidental, huh?
OK, this is probably going to be one of the posts that the city manager will probably label as bad or misleading information.
If you have any comments about this post, any other post, or anything else, go here http://shawneeray.proboards.com/
Now, why do I say this? Easy.....at last week's committee meeting the agenda packets again (as usual) did not include all the info.
See, what happens is the city posts an agenda packet on line, and then the same thing is available at city hall before the meeting. But, not all of the info is in there. The full spectrum of information which is going to be discussed with the documents is left off. In this case, it was more items concerning the proposed budget. Very similar situation as to the one I posted about on 5/26 below entitled "Open Government??? Yeah Right!!!!" (scroll down to read it if you'd like).
Now, sometimes the info is included in the minutes packet, after the fact, and that can be weeks after the meeting.
I'm waiting to hear councilmember Jeff Vaught start pontificating about how the city received an award for open government. If one reads the basis for that, it concerns mostly a web site with links to certain items.............but it does not include a review of the completeness of those items or their depth. Part of this was covered in my post of 9/14/2012 "Shedding Light on Sunshine Review" http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2012/09/shedding-light-on-sunshine-review.html The city got its high rating just when the topic of going back to full meeting minutes came up for a vote. It's also interesting, that as a result of a KORA request, we found out that there was a flurry of emails back and forth for a few days preceding that award, (and the vote on the minutes) with the city pushing to see what it had to do to upgrade its rating. Coincidental, huh?
OK, this is probably going to be one of the posts that the city manager will probably label as bad or misleading information.
If you have any comments about this post, any other post, or anything else, go here http://shawneeray.proboards.com/
Sunday, June 16, 2013
Kuhn Critical of Other Councilmembers for Asking Questions About Budget
On June 4, 2013 at a council committee meeting (regarding the budget) in Shawnee KS there was an item on the budget that two council members asked for clarification. It involved spending at least $5,000 for dental work on a new police dog that cost $15,000. One councilmember (Michelle Distler) was curious if that money could be recouped from the dealer. Most special bred dogs come with some form of medical guarantee. The other councilmember, (Dr. Mike Kemmling), a dentist, was curious as to exactly what type of work was done. Two simple questions, yet Dawn Kuhn thought her fellow council members shouldn't be asking these questions. The two councilmembers who asked the questions did so in a very polite, respectful manner.
Want to comment about this post, any other post, or anything? Go here http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Shawnee Citizen Police Academy 2013
The Shawnee Police Department will be holding their next Citizen Police Academy from Sep 5 to Nov 14. Sessions will be on Thursday evenings except for two Saturdays.
This is a wonderful opportunity for citizens to find out more about what our PD does. Individuals have to be over 18 and preference is given to individuals who either live or work within Shawnee as the class size is limited to 20.
More information is available at http://gsh.cityofshawnee.org/web/PoliceCMS.nsf/vwNews/806A1371FA17F194862578F00053AF40?OpenDocument
and
http://gsh.cityofshawnee.org/web/PoliceCMS.nsf/c0019294e957d2c28525754a004b58b4/1f63b144015267ea862578cb00715d24?OpenDocument
An on line application is available at
http://gsh.cityofshawnee.org/web/PoliceCMS.nsf/c0019294e957d2c28525754a004b58b4/aca253c9a50da3a6862578d200517b6a?OpenDocument
I personally attended the academy in 2012 and was impressed with the way the classes were conducted. We were also given information as to what an individual has to do to become a police officer in Shawnee. Very informative.
Want to comment about this post? Or any other post? Or anything? Go here http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com/
This is a wonderful opportunity for citizens to find out more about what our PD does. Individuals have to be over 18 and preference is given to individuals who either live or work within Shawnee as the class size is limited to 20.
More information is available at http://gsh.cityofshawnee.org/web/PoliceCMS.nsf/vwNews/806A1371FA17F194862578F00053AF40?OpenDocument
and
http://gsh.cityofshawnee.org/web/PoliceCMS.nsf/c0019294e957d2c28525754a004b58b4/1f63b144015267ea862578cb00715d24?OpenDocument
An on line application is available at
http://gsh.cityofshawnee.org/web/PoliceCMS.nsf/c0019294e957d2c28525754a004b58b4/aca253c9a50da3a6862578d200517b6a?OpenDocument
I personally attended the academy in 2012 and was impressed with the way the classes were conducted. We were also given information as to what an individual has to do to become a police officer in Shawnee. Very informative.
Want to comment about this post? Or any other post? Or anything? Go here http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com/
Sunday, June 02, 2013
New Forum Set Up
We have set up a new forum at http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com/
We tried this about 4 years ago but some of the posts were downright nasty. That is not the concept. Vulgarity will not be accepted.
Anybody can read this forum. But to post a comment an individual needs to register. Folks may choose a screen name rather than using their own name. Also, if they do not want to use their identifiable email addresses then I would suggest getting a Gmail, Hotmail or Yahoo type of email address. You will need that to obtain access code info.
We tried this about 4 years ago but some of the posts were downright nasty. That is not the concept. Vulgarity will not be accepted.
Anybody can read this forum. But to post a comment an individual needs to register. Folks may choose a screen name rather than using their own name. Also, if they do not want to use their identifiable email addresses then I would suggest getting a Gmail, Hotmail or Yahoo type of email address. You will need that to obtain access code info.
Friday, May 31, 2013
Perseverance Pays Off For Shawnee PD, And the Community
On Tuesday night I just had to address the city council and get it on the record what a tremendous job the PD has done in the Gerry Grovenburg murder case.
Tenacity and perseverance pays off. One individual is now incarcerated pending trial and the info is out there on his accomplice.
Most people are under false impressions of how police departments solve crimes. We see on TV that a detective gets some evidence with his/her morning coffee and then by his/her lunch has the lab, DNA, ballistics, medical examiner's, toxicology reports etc. all finalized.
It doesn't work that way. Those reports take time It takes hard work, and an ability to connect the dots. Leads must be continuously followed up and double checked. When the PD presents the info to the DA for prosecution they have to be able to back up their conclusions.
Some cases are harder to solve than others. This was one of them. But, the men and women of our PD never gave up. We have a great department.
The next time you see one of our local cops, give 'em a thumbs up. Let 'em know you appreciate them.
For more info on what happened go to http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/may/29/two-men-charged-connection-2010-shawnee-murder/
Tenacity and perseverance pays off. One individual is now incarcerated pending trial and the info is out there on his accomplice.
Most people are under false impressions of how police departments solve crimes. We see on TV that a detective gets some evidence with his/her morning coffee and then by his/her lunch has the lab, DNA, ballistics, medical examiner's, toxicology reports etc. all finalized.
It doesn't work that way. Those reports take time It takes hard work, and an ability to connect the dots. Leads must be continuously followed up and double checked. When the PD presents the info to the DA for prosecution they have to be able to back up their conclusions.
Some cases are harder to solve than others. This was one of them. But, the men and women of our PD never gave up. We have a great department.
The next time you see one of our local cops, give 'em a thumbs up. Let 'em know you appreciate them.
For more info on what happened go to http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/may/29/two-men-charged-connection-2010-shawnee-murder/
Monday, May 27, 2013
Memorial Day - 2013
Memorial Day 2013
The Star Spangled Banner without a rock diva, Super Bowl XXXIX
And yes, I'm proud to be an American, and I won't apologize for it,
The Star Spangled Banner without a rock diva, Super Bowl XXXIX
And yes, I'm proud to be an American, and I won't apologize for it,
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Open Government??? Yeah, right!!!!
Ya gotta love it.
How did we find out that the proposed Public Information position would cost approximately $70K?
Was that info listed on line in the agenda packet before the committee meeting? Noper.
Was it available in the packet that was given out at the meeting to the public? Noper.
The info became known because Mr. Sawyer asked about that cost as that is how it was listed in the documents he received.
So, is it a big show to have these budget meetings open to the public with INCOMPLETE info?
Ahhh yes, now these comments of mine today are probably going to be considered bad information which is supposedly one of the justifications for creating this position.
How did we find out that the proposed Public Information position would cost approximately $70K?
Was that info listed on line in the agenda packet before the committee meeting? Noper.
Was it available in the packet that was given out at the meeting to the public? Noper.
The info became known because Mr. Sawyer asked about that cost as that is how it was listed in the documents he received.
So, is it a big show to have these budget meetings open to the public with INCOMPLETE info?
Ahhh yes, now these comments of mine today are probably going to be considered bad information which is supposedly one of the justifications for creating this position.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Shawnee Strongly Supports Our Guard & Reserve
The City of Shawnee is one of 30 finalists for the 2013 Secretary of Defense Employer Support Freedom Award.
Since 2,899 employers were nominated this is quite a feat to be in the final selection group of 30.
Fifteen of the 30 will be selected for the award, which will take place this summer.
As a veteran, I am very happy to hear this about Shawnee.
More information is available at http://www.cityofshawnee.org/WEB/ShawneeCMS.nsf/vwNews/666AF67122A8660786257B730063BEF4?OpenDocument
Since 2,899 employers were nominated this is quite a feat to be in the final selection group of 30.
Fifteen of the 30 will be selected for the award, which will take place this summer.
As a veteran, I am very happy to hear this about Shawnee.
More information is available at http://www.cityofshawnee.org/WEB/ShawneeCMS.nsf/vwNews/666AF67122A8660786257B730063BEF4?OpenDocument
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Ooops, Did I Make A Mistake?
Regarding the possibility of the city establishing a public information officer position I posted an item on 5/1/13. (You can scroll down to read the whole post)
Part of that post contained the statement:
The city staff has a city manager, a deputy city manager (recently promoted from assistant city manager) and an assistant to the city manager. Heck, which one of them has been putting the publicity stuff up on the city's web site? And what about the emails that go out to the listserv addresses? And the facebook and twitter stuff already? And can't one of them handle verbal and or written communications with the local media?
Well, what was the mistake? The city no longer has an assistant to the city manager. That person is now an Assistant City Manager. Promotion time. This came out last night when part of the budget was being reviewed.
Also last night, Councilmember Sawyer questioned the projected remuneration for that position. Apparently the document he was looking at showed $70,000. The city manager said that it could be less depending on the person who was hired. Mr. Sawyer wanted to know if that $70K was salary or if it included salary plus approximately an additional 25% in benefits. If that figure sticks, then the position would pay approximately $55K in salary and approximately $15K in benefits.
So, now we know that a City Manager, a Deputy City Manager and an Assistant City Manager are not equipped to answer questions from the media/public and/or issue press releases concerning the city. If they were equipped and capable, then the city manager would not be asking for the additional position.
Part of that post contained the statement:
The city staff has a city manager, a deputy city manager (recently promoted from assistant city manager) and an assistant to the city manager. Heck, which one of them has been putting the publicity stuff up on the city's web site? And what about the emails that go out to the listserv addresses? And the facebook and twitter stuff already? And can't one of them handle verbal and or written communications with the local media?
Well, what was the mistake? The city no longer has an assistant to the city manager. That person is now an Assistant City Manager. Promotion time. This came out last night when part of the budget was being reviewed.
Also last night, Councilmember Sawyer questioned the projected remuneration for that position. Apparently the document he was looking at showed $70,000. The city manager said that it could be less depending on the person who was hired. Mr. Sawyer wanted to know if that $70K was salary or if it included salary plus approximately an additional 25% in benefits. If that figure sticks, then the position would pay approximately $55K in salary and approximately $15K in benefits.
So, now we know that a City Manager, a Deputy City Manager and an Assistant City Manager are not equipped to answer questions from the media/public and/or issue press releases concerning the city. If they were equipped and capable, then the city manager would not be asking for the additional position.
Monday, May 20, 2013
Letters, They Get Letters (and don't respond)
A copy of a letter I sent to the governing body on 4/9/13
Please pay attention to the part where I ask for verification of Dawn Kuhn's statement. To date, I have not received any such verification. Nobody has produced any verification that I had been given that answer for "six years". Well, that leads me to believe that:
a. Kuhn is so arrogant that she feels she doesn't need to respond
b. No such documentation exists which means Kuhn was telling a fairy tale (lying)
Also, she said that 3 lawyers told her it could be a HIPPA violation. Geeee, I spoke to lawyers also, and they say only med professionals who release info without authorization are guilty of HIPPA violations. Only problem is that Kuhn's comments are on the record.
What else has she not been forthcoming about? Gee, she has never explained why she gets her city pay check as "White" and her city expense checks as "Kuhn". Strange.
I even wonder if her current address is valid. After her divorce she relocated to another address in Ward 3. Or did she? Is it possible that she is pulling a Phill Kline? Is that address just a "mail drop" (which unfortunately would still be legal) but that she is domiciled elsewhere? Outside of Ward 3?
As you may recall approximately two weeks ago I addressed council and inquired to have Mr Willoughby provide the law that said sharing rooms was illegal.
T hat now brings up another item. Ms Kuhn’s attempt
to have me cut off after her speech. Because I appeared to be asking a
question?
First, when a member of the public comes up to speak they
are going to either make a statement or ask a question. Granted, the
answer may not be readily available, and may take some time to gather, but a
question from the public is normal. Second, when a member of the council
engages in a long winded commentary doesn’t a member of the community have the
right to respond? Or are we attempting to cut off the public?
A few weeks ago during a meeting one individual got up and after five minutes Ms Kuhn mentioned to the mayor the time limit. Ironically the next speaker (Mr. Chipman) spoke for over 20 minutes and at no time did Ms Kuhn attempt to advise the mayor of the time limit. Selective permissions?
Please pay attention to the part where I ask for verification of Dawn Kuhn's statement. To date, I have not received any such verification. Nobody has produced any verification that I had been given that answer for "six years". Well, that leads me to believe that:
a. Kuhn is so arrogant that she feels she doesn't need to respond
b. No such documentation exists which means Kuhn was telling a fairy tale (lying)
Also, she said that 3 lawyers told her it could be a HIPPA violation. Geeee, I spoke to lawyers also, and they say only med professionals who release info without authorization are guilty of HIPPA violations. Only problem is that Kuhn's comments are on the record.
What else has she not been forthcoming about? Gee, she has never explained why she gets her city pay check as "White" and her city expense checks as "Kuhn". Strange.
I even wonder if her current address is valid. After her divorce she relocated to another address in Ward 3. Or did she? Is it possible that she is pulling a Phill Kline? Is that address just a "mail drop" (which unfortunately would still be legal) but that she is domiciled elsewhere? Outside of Ward 3?
Governing Body
As you may recall approximately two weeks ago I addressed council and inquired to have Mr Willoughby provide the law that said sharing rooms was illegal.
At that point Ms Kuhn immediately started one of her
excessively verbose commentaries with regards to HIPPA, potential lawsuits,
etc. What I found intriguing was that Ms Kuhn stated that was the same
answer that had been provided to me every year for six years when I brought up
the subject
Can Ms Kuhn or anyone produce documentation (city minutes
or audio) that what she says is accurate? That I had been given that answer in
the past? The usual response has been a perfunctory “thank you for
coming up”. I sincerely question the veracity of her statement. It
is interesting to note that Mr Willoughby admitted he should not have used the
term illegal.
A few weeks ago during a meeting one individual got up and after five minutes Ms Kuhn mentioned to the mayor the time limit. Ironically the next speaker (Mr. Chipman) spoke for over 20 minutes and at no time did Ms Kuhn attempt to advise the mayor of the time limit. Selective permissions?
Does Shawnee really want to have its openness
challenged? And that can be done very easily. Ms Kuhn was concerned
about lawsuits regarding HIPPA. What about actions regarding the 1st
Amendment to the US Constitution and Section 3 of the Bill of Rights of the
Kansas Constitution?
The mayor has publicly stated that some people ask too many
questions. Maybe the problem is that not enough citizens ask more
questions
Tuesday, May 07, 2013
Rob Roberts to Leave the Shawnee Dispatch
Rob Roberts will be leaving the Shawnee Dispatch to take a position with the Kansas City Business Journal. We would like to wish Rob the best as he joins the staff of one of the more prestigious niche periodicals in the metro area.
Rob's tenure with the Dispatch was a welcome change from that of some of his predecessors. As a skilled, long term journalist he realized that he had a responsibility to tell it like it is. As such, he reported the good, the bad and the ugly, which did not necessarily endear him to certain folks at city hall. There are some who feel that a local paper should only be a cheerleader for the city. That is wrong. Maybe that is one of the reasons why the city now wants a PIO, because they could not have control over the local media, like they had in the past.
Anyway, it will be interesting to see how Rob's replacement handles things. Will he be realistic and objective, reporting all aspects of what happens? Or will he, like some others become a puppet for city hall?
Another thing that time will tell.
Rob's tenure with the Dispatch was a welcome change from that of some of his predecessors. As a skilled, long term journalist he realized that he had a responsibility to tell it like it is. As such, he reported the good, the bad and the ugly, which did not necessarily endear him to certain folks at city hall. There are some who feel that a local paper should only be a cheerleader for the city. That is wrong. Maybe that is one of the reasons why the city now wants a PIO, because they could not have control over the local media, like they had in the past.
Anyway, it will be interesting to see how Rob's replacement handles things. Will he be realistic and objective, reporting all aspects of what happens? Or will he, like some others become a puppet for city hall?
Another thing that time will tell.
Friday, May 03, 2013
Google This
Last night, at a hastily called special City Council meeting the city approved an agreement to get the ball rolling on bringing Google Fiber to Shawnee.
Super high speed internet (and TV) will be very good for Shawnee's residents and eventually businesses. Another benefit will be that the city offices will be connected through the fiber network and WiFi at no charge. Sounds like a savings of taxpayer money to me. Believe the agreement is for a ten year period.
My only question is why did the mayor have to call a special meeting (less than 8 hours before the meeting time)? Why couldn't this have been handled at the next regular council meeting? That would also have allowed folks to read and absorb the info, and if needed, to be able to ask questions.
No time frame is available yet.
Super high speed internet (and TV) will be very good for Shawnee's residents and eventually businesses. Another benefit will be that the city offices will be connected through the fiber network and WiFi at no charge. Sounds like a savings of taxpayer money to me. Believe the agreement is for a ten year period.
My only question is why did the mayor have to call a special meeting (less than 8 hours before the meeting time)? Why couldn't this have been handled at the next regular council meeting? That would also have allowed folks to read and absorb the info, and if needed, to be able to ask questions.
No time frame is available yet.
Wednesday, May 01, 2013
Fireworks or Spinworks
The more I think about the city manager wanting to hire a full time public information officer, the more I wonder why.
Shawnee is a city of approximately 62,000 folks. The city staff has a city manager, a deputy city manager (recently promoted from assistant city manager) and an assistant to the city manager. Heck, which one of them has been putting the publicity stuff up on the city's web site? And what about the emails that go out to the listserv addresses? And the facebook and twitter stuff already? And can't one of them handle verbal and or written communications with the local media?
Now, if the city has that kind of money, and who knows what the position is going to pay (plus benefits), I'd like to see us get our July 4th fireworks in Shawnee Mission Park back.
So, if you agree with me, email the council and the mayor by sending an email to governingbody@cityofshawnee.org When you send an email there it goes to all 8 council members and the mayor. Let them know that you'd rather have fireworks instead of spinworks.
Also, if you know of anybody else who might also like that idea, please pass this on to them.
Shawnee is a city of approximately 62,000 folks. The city staff has a city manager, a deputy city manager (recently promoted from assistant city manager) and an assistant to the city manager. Heck, which one of them has been putting the publicity stuff up on the city's web site? And what about the emails that go out to the listserv addresses? And the facebook and twitter stuff already? And can't one of them handle verbal and or written communications with the local media?
Now, if the city has that kind of money, and who knows what the position is going to pay (plus benefits), I'd like to see us get our July 4th fireworks in Shawnee Mission Park back.
So, if you agree with me, email the council and the mayor by sending an email to governingbody@cityofshawnee.org When you send an email there it goes to all 8 council members and the mayor. Let them know that you'd rather have fireworks instead of spinworks.
Also, if you know of anybody else who might also like that idea, please pass this on to them.
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Time Will Tell
An interesting, possibly positive thing happened at the 4/22/13 city council meeting.
The necessary machinery was put into effect to start the first building (150,000 sq ft) in the Westlink Business Center Industrial Park.
The information that was presented by Andrew Nave, Executive Director of the Shawnee Economic Development Council was that the building would eventually be home to approximately 320 new jobs for Shawnee. He also went on to show us what number of those would be new residents (80), new students in the schools, and all of the other pertinent demographics to include various dollar figures.
Personally I think the building will bring new jobs to Shawnee. And, I believe it will bring some new residents, students for the schools and additional money.
What I don't believe is, IMHO, the over inflated numbers. We have all seen these types of buildings in other industrial parks.
Many of them become very large warehouse/distribution centers, which, because of automation, may have 2-3 dozen employees.
Other buildings like this wind up being subdivided into 8-12 smaller units. These then become small businesses, (usually of a mini warehouse/distribution type) which may employ 3-9 people each
So, do I think this is a positive step? Yes. Do I think the numbers presented to the council were pie in the sky? Yes.
But then, time will tell.................
Sidebar: We still haven't heard anything about creating a destination venue to draw from all the athletic tournaments, NASCAR races, concerts etc.
The necessary machinery was put into effect to start the first building (150,000 sq ft) in the Westlink Business Center Industrial Park.
The information that was presented by Andrew Nave, Executive Director of the Shawnee Economic Development Council was that the building would eventually be home to approximately 320 new jobs for Shawnee. He also went on to show us what number of those would be new residents (80), new students in the schools, and all of the other pertinent demographics to include various dollar figures.
Personally I think the building will bring new jobs to Shawnee. And, I believe it will bring some new residents, students for the schools and additional money.
What I don't believe is, IMHO, the over inflated numbers. We have all seen these types of buildings in other industrial parks.
Many of them become very large warehouse/distribution centers, which, because of automation, may have 2-3 dozen employees.
Other buildings like this wind up being subdivided into 8-12 smaller units. These then become small businesses, (usually of a mini warehouse/distribution type) which may employ 3-9 people each
So, do I think this is a positive step? Yes. Do I think the numbers presented to the council were pie in the sky? Yes.
But then, time will tell.................
Sidebar: We still haven't heard anything about creating a destination venue to draw from all the athletic tournaments, NASCAR races, concerts etc.
Thursday, April 25, 2013
New Position At City Hall
At last week's committee meeting the city manager gave an over view of the 2014 city budget.
One item, as reported in the Shawnee Dispatch is somewhat interesting: http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/apr/23/city-manager-2014-budget-wont-require-tax-increase/
"In addition, staff is recommending the addition of two new city employees, a public information officer and an emergency manager, as high-priority budget issues.
According to Gonzales, Shawnee’s first public information officer is needed to get out more and accurate information to satisfy public demand and to counter bad information sometimes disseminated by bloggers and traditional media sources.
The city’s image has suffered as a result of not having anyone dedicated to the city’s public information effort full-time, Gonzales added. In addition to promoting good news stories about the city and countering inaccurate information, she said, the public information officer would be responsible for maximizing use of social media and other communications avenues."
"Bad information disseminated by bloggers and traditional media sources." Hmmm, I thought nobody cared about what local bloggers say Traditional media sources.....does that mean that the city is upset that they have been unable to control the local traditional media? That they are no longer the rah rah cheerleaders for the city and now show all sides of a story?
Bad information? Notice the choice of words......."bad information". Well, if folks don't want "bad information" to be disseminated, then don't do bad things. What bad things? Oh, things like appointing a relative of the mayor to a council position in a manner that the JoCo DA calls it a violation of the spirit of the Kansas Open Meetings Act? Or sending eight people to a conference in Boston?
A public information officer...............hmmmm.....will that person be objective? Or will their function be to provide only the good, forgetting the bad and the ugly? Will they ignore citizen inquiries, like some council members do and fail to respond to valid questions? (More on that coming soon).
How many JoCo cities have a public information officer?
An afterthought: Waiting to hear the comments from certain councilmembers justifying the PIO position......especially those who were against spending the money to restore full minutes of council meetings.
One item, as reported in the Shawnee Dispatch is somewhat interesting: http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/apr/23/city-manager-2014-budget-wont-require-tax-increase/
"In addition, staff is recommending the addition of two new city employees, a public information officer and an emergency manager, as high-priority budget issues.
According to Gonzales, Shawnee’s first public information officer is needed to get out more and accurate information to satisfy public demand and to counter bad information sometimes disseminated by bloggers and traditional media sources.
The city’s image has suffered as a result of not having anyone dedicated to the city’s public information effort full-time, Gonzales added. In addition to promoting good news stories about the city and countering inaccurate information, she said, the public information officer would be responsible for maximizing use of social media and other communications avenues."
"Bad information disseminated by bloggers and traditional media sources." Hmmm, I thought nobody cared about what local bloggers say
Bad information? Notice the choice of words......."bad information". Well, if folks don't want "bad information" to be disseminated, then don't do bad things. What bad things? Oh, things like appointing a relative of the mayor to a council position in a manner that the JoCo DA calls it a violation of the spirit of the Kansas Open Meetings Act? Or sending eight people to a conference in Boston?
A public information officer...............hmmmm.....will that person be objective? Or will their function be to provide only the good, forgetting the bad and the ugly? Will they ignore citizen inquiries, like some council members do and fail to respond to valid questions? (More on that coming soon).
How many JoCo cities have a public information officer?
An afterthought: Waiting to hear the comments from certain councilmembers justifying the PIO position......especially those who were against spending the money to restore full minutes of council meetings.
Friday, April 19, 2013
Sign Up - Stay Informed
Many times I have ranted about the lack of citizen involvement with city government. The fact is, it is very poor in Shawnee.
One thing citizens can do is sign up for the city's email notification system. You can receive advance notice of meetings (council, committees, boards and commissions) along with copies of the agendas. You can also choose to receive notice of bids, job openings and some other items.
Get on the email notification list............it might just help to keep you up to date on what is happening.
Go here to sign up http://www.cityofshawnee.org/Web/ShawneeCMS.nsf/frmSignUp?OpenForm
One thing citizens can do is sign up for the city's email notification system. You can receive advance notice of meetings (council, committees, boards and commissions) along with copies of the agendas. You can also choose to receive notice of bids, job openings and some other items.
Get on the email notification list............it might just help to keep you up to date on what is happening.
Go here to sign up http://www.cityofshawnee.org/Web/ShawneeCMS.nsf/frmSignUp?OpenForm
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Another Race Weekend, Another Lost Opportunity
Ahh yes. This weekend there will be another race at the Kansas Speedway, and, as in the past, Shawnee will miss out on some tangential income.
Granted, our two hotels at Midland & I-435 will see an increase as well as the eateries in that area. But what are we really missing? Where is that third one?
There are a variety of events held at the Village West complex. Various races at the Kansas Speedway, Concerts, Minor League Baseball etc. Add to that the various athletic tournaments that come into the area. We get very little bleed off from these. Why? Because we do not have a substantial amount of destination venues in Shawnee. In reality, we don't have any destination venues.
There are some members of the council who keep saying they are in favor of economic development. Well, where is it? Yes, I know, there are plans to develop an area by K7 and the river into an industrial park (warehouses and manufacturing spaces). Someday, down the road. But where are the plans for revenue generators? Hotels, restaurants, entertainment facilities. True destination venues. Warehouses and manufacturing facilities do not get us bleed off from the events at Village West.
Another weekend, and more lost opportunities to bring income into Shawnee.
Granted, our two hotels at Midland & I-435 will see an increase as well as the eateries in that area. But what are we really missing? Where is that third one?
There are a variety of events held at the Village West complex. Various races at the Kansas Speedway, Concerts, Minor League Baseball etc. Add to that the various athletic tournaments that come into the area. We get very little bleed off from these. Why? Because we do not have a substantial amount of destination venues in Shawnee. In reality, we don't have any destination venues.
There are some members of the council who keep saying they are in favor of economic development. Well, where is it? Yes, I know, there are plans to develop an area by K7 and the river into an industrial park (warehouses and manufacturing spaces). Someday, down the road. But where are the plans for revenue generators? Hotels, restaurants, entertainment facilities. True destination venues. Warehouses and manufacturing facilities do not get us bleed off from the events at Village West.
Another weekend, and more lost opportunities to bring income into Shawnee.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
City Budget Process
Over the years I have heard many folks wonder why certain things were or were not done in the city.
Things ranging from street maintenance to public safety staffing. From parks maintenance to sewer maintenance. What I usually hear is why was this done? Or, why didn't we do that?
Most of the answers are based on financial considerations. Just like folks sit down and review their family's finances, the city does the same. When people ask most of their questions is after the fact.
Whooops, wrong time for the public to get involved.
The time to get involved is up front, yet the citizen participation at council meetings is severely lacking in Shawnee.
The city has published its schedule of meetings that will involve the budget process. That can be viewed at http://www.cityofshawnee.org/WEB/ShawneeCMS.nsf/b62f116aa62dde94862575680053ac82/b68e0226e0c94c6586257b4b004a7211?OpenDocument
Get involved...............show up at these meetings...............inquire of your council members ahead of time about budget items that concern you (as opposed to after the fact). Let them know what you agree with..............and what you may disagree with. Find out why things are or are not done. Be informed.
Things ranging from street maintenance to public safety staffing. From parks maintenance to sewer maintenance. What I usually hear is why was this done? Or, why didn't we do that?
Most of the answers are based on financial considerations. Just like folks sit down and review their family's finances, the city does the same. When people ask most of their questions is after the fact.
Whooops, wrong time for the public to get involved.
The time to get involved is up front, yet the citizen participation at council meetings is severely lacking in Shawnee.
The city has published its schedule of meetings that will involve the budget process. That can be viewed at http://www.cityofshawnee.org/WEB/ShawneeCMS.nsf/b62f116aa62dde94862575680053ac82/b68e0226e0c94c6586257b4b004a7211?OpenDocument
Get involved...............show up at these meetings...............inquire of your council members ahead of time about budget items that concern you (as opposed to after the fact). Let them know what you agree with..............and what you may disagree with. Find out why things are or are not done. Be informed.
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Local Entertainment - Shawnee City Council
The Shawnee Dispatch has a neat article about last Tuesday's city council meeting. http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/apr/10/neighbor-vaught-win-council-leadership-positions-d/
Going to a council meeting can be a great form of entertainment.
When the vote was taken for Pflumm for Vice-Chair I could have sworn that it sounded like 5-3 in favor, but apparently the mayor could not determine that, so he went for a roll call. True, Jim Neighbor was the first to vote, and after a long pause, and a stare down from the mayor, he voted no. That then brought up the 4-4 vote,
Kuhn's comment to the mayor that she would like to be considered for the Vice-Chair position was actually an "off mike" comment, as she leaned across and addressed the mayor directly. It took an obnoxious out of order citizen to yell out from the floor "What did she say?" to get the mayor to say what it was. Kuhn does that a lot, talks sideways to the mayor, when she needs to be speaking directly into the microphone. Anyway, it was kind of funny that nobody seconded the nomination for her to be Vice-Chair. Bet her ego took a wrap on that one.
I found that very entertaining in view of her comments that the council president was elected not as a popularity contest or longevity, but for someone who could fill in for the mayor. So, Jim Neighbor can fill in for the mayor? Couldn't prove it to me. He is probably one of the least active members of the council at the meetings. He says very little so it is hard to tell what his position is until a vote comes along. But, one does not know why he votes that way either. But I guess Kuhn must know what talents he possesses to fill in for the mayor.
Going to a council meeting can be a great form of entertainment.
When the vote was taken for Pflumm for Vice-Chair I could have sworn that it sounded like 5-3 in favor, but apparently the mayor could not determine that, so he went for a roll call. True, Jim Neighbor was the first to vote, and after a long pause, and a stare down from the mayor, he voted no. That then brought up the 4-4 vote,
Kuhn's comment to the mayor that she would like to be considered for the Vice-Chair position was actually an "off mike" comment, as she leaned across and addressed the mayor directly. It took an obnoxious out of order citizen to yell out from the floor "What did she say?" to get the mayor to say what it was. Kuhn does that a lot, talks sideways to the mayor, when she needs to be speaking directly into the microphone. Anyway, it was kind of funny that nobody seconded the nomination for her to be Vice-Chair. Bet her ego took a wrap on that one.
I found that very entertaining in view of her comments that the council president was elected not as a popularity contest or longevity, but for someone who could fill in for the mayor. So, Jim Neighbor can fill in for the mayor? Couldn't prove it to me. He is probably one of the least active members of the council at the meetings. He says very little so it is hard to tell what his position is until a vote comes along. But, one does not know why he votes that way either. But I guess Kuhn must know what talents he possesses to fill in for the mayor.
Thursday, April 04, 2013
Local Business Robbed and Vandalized
Prepress Graphics and Professionals was broken into this past Tuesday evening or early Wednesday morning.
Thieves not only stole various items, they then vandalized and destroyed equipment on the premises. The business is owned by Dan Distler, father of Ward IV council member Michelle Distler.
More information about what happened is available at the Shawnee Dispatch's web site http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/apr/03/printing-firm-owned-officials-father-robbed-vandal/
If anyone has information about this crime they are asked to please call the Shawnee PD at 913-631-2155
Thieves not only stole various items, they then vandalized and destroyed equipment on the premises. The business is owned by Dan Distler, father of Ward IV council member Michelle Distler.
More information about what happened is available at the Shawnee Dispatch's web site http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/apr/03/printing-firm-owned-officials-father-robbed-vandal/
If anyone has information about this crime they are asked to please call the Shawnee PD at 913-631-2155
Wednesday, April 03, 2013
Ward II Residents Are The Winners
In yesterday's council election the residents of Ward II made themselves the winners. They chose Mike Kemmling as their new council member over Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage).
Willoughby's appointment last summer to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of David Morris caused a major uproar. The uproar culminated in the JoCo DA issuing a statement that the appointment was the result of a backroom deal with the mayor as the ringleader.
Kemmling who also applied for the open position at that time had previously run against Neal Sawyer and lost by only 11 votes (661 to 650). Disregarding the strong showing Kemmling had displayed the position went to Willoughby.
So, yesterday, the residents of Ward II showed that they were fed up with cronyism and nepotism. They, the residents of Ward II, became the real winners.
Congratulations to the residents of Ward II and to Mike Kemmling.
Willoughby's appointment last summer to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of David Morris caused a major uproar. The uproar culminated in the JoCo DA issuing a statement that the appointment was the result of a backroom deal with the mayor as the ringleader.
Kemmling who also applied for the open position at that time had previously run against Neal Sawyer and lost by only 11 votes (661 to 650). Disregarding the strong showing Kemmling had displayed the position went to Willoughby.
So, yesterday, the residents of Ward II showed that they were fed up with cronyism and nepotism. They, the residents of Ward II, became the real winners.
Congratulations to the residents of Ward II and to Mike Kemmling.
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Which Face is Jeff Vaught Showing Today - Part 2?
Let's talk about the minutes of the council meetings.
At one point we had detailed minutes of council proceedings. With audio CDs available for a fee.
Then, Vaught got involved with the movement by some, not all, but enough, of the city council to change that to summary minutes with audio available. Now, what was supposed to be summary minutes actually turned out to be action minutes, an even less informative method of a written record.
On his facebook page Vaught indicates that he was a positive force in getting the issue of bringing back detailed minutes. Well, in a way he was.
But, what happened when the issue came before the council committee (8/21/12)? Now, since we only had action minutes at that time basically only the final vote is recorded. Vaught was one of 4 councilmembers who voted against bringing back the detailed minutes. Since four others voted in favor, the item was moved forward to the council meeting of 9/10/12 with a "no recommendation" from the committee. If someone wants to listen to the audio of the council committee meeting of 8/21/12 it is available on the city's site. Listen to it and then make up your own mind if Vaught was in favor of reinstating full minutes.
At the full council meeting of 9/10/12 he did vote to reinstate the full minutes. Ironically, at various subsequent council meetings he has made negative comments about the costs of those minutes. But, I guess full minutes aren't as important as sending 8 people to Boston for a conference (when 4 or less would have been more than sufficient).
At one point we had detailed minutes of council proceedings. With audio CDs available for a fee.
Then, Vaught got involved with the movement by some, not all, but enough, of the city council to change that to summary minutes with audio available. Now, what was supposed to be summary minutes actually turned out to be action minutes, an even less informative method of a written record.
On his facebook page Vaught indicates that he was a positive force in getting the issue of bringing back detailed minutes. Well, in a way he was.
But, what happened when the issue came before the council committee (8/21/12)? Now, since we only had action minutes at that time basically only the final vote is recorded. Vaught was one of 4 councilmembers who voted against bringing back the detailed minutes. Since four others voted in favor, the item was moved forward to the council meeting of 9/10/12 with a "no recommendation" from the committee. If someone wants to listen to the audio of the council committee meeting of 8/21/12 it is available on the city's site. Listen to it and then make up your own mind if Vaught was in favor of reinstating full minutes.
At the full council meeting of 9/10/12 he did vote to reinstate the full minutes. Ironically, at various subsequent council meetings he has made negative comments about the costs of those minutes. But, I guess full minutes aren't as important as sending 8 people to Boston for a conference (when 4 or less would have been more than sufficient).
Saturday, March 30, 2013
Is It A "Goode" Letter?
Recently, the Shawnee Dispatch ran an article about a letter signed by Frank Goode.
The letter purportedly has Frank withdrawing support for Mike Kemmling and endorsing Alan Willoughby.
The Dispatch goes into quite a bit of detail on how this letter turns up the Friday before the last published edition of the paper. The reporter did some additional research and it appears that Willoughby walked into the nursing facility where Frank was, and, as Frank says he (Frank) was a little "dopey". Frank has had some major medical problems and apparently has gone through various procedures and apparently different meds.
Read the article and see for yourself. It looks to me like a candidate (Willoughby) was trying to take advantage of a sick old man who was medicated for his health problems, and attempting to blame his opponent (Kemmling) for dirty tricks. Uncle Alan, you should be ashamed of yourself.
As I posted on the Dispatch: Willoughby is claiming the other side is up to dirty tricks. Hey, Uncle Alan, did you read the DA's letter? Your appointment to the council was a dirty trick, a backroom deal, with your nephew as the ringleader
The article is here: http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/mar/26/contrary-letter-frank-goode-not-taking-sides-counc/
The letter purportedly has Frank withdrawing support for Mike Kemmling and endorsing Alan Willoughby.
The Dispatch goes into quite a bit of detail on how this letter turns up the Friday before the last published edition of the paper. The reporter did some additional research and it appears that Willoughby walked into the nursing facility where Frank was, and, as Frank says he (Frank) was a little "dopey". Frank has had some major medical problems and apparently has gone through various procedures and apparently different meds.
Read the article and see for yourself. It looks to me like a candidate (Willoughby) was trying to take advantage of a sick old man who was medicated for his health problems, and attempting to blame his opponent (Kemmling) for dirty tricks. Uncle Alan, you should be ashamed of yourself.
As I posted on the Dispatch: Willoughby is claiming the other side is up to dirty tricks. Hey, Uncle Alan, did you read the DA's letter? Your appointment to the council was a dirty trick, a backroom deal, with your nephew as the ringleader
The article is here: http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/mar/26/contrary-letter-frank-goode-not-taking-sides-counc/
Friday, March 29, 2013
Which Face is Jeff Vaught Showing Today?
Jeff Vaught appears to be very proud of the fact that at one time he was the president of his Homeowner's Association (Crimson Ridge). It's in his literature, his web site etc. My question is, are his neighbors proud of him now?
There has been much written in the Kansas City Star and The Shawnee Dispatch about the proposed Crimson Ridge Stream Mitigation Bank locally referred to as the "snake habitat". An on line search will come up with a plethora of articles.
Basically, this is something that the residents of his sub-division are not happy about. Ironically, neither is the US Department of the Interior or the Environmental Protection Agency.
http://www.shawneefwiw.com/files/CrimsonRidge/EPA_comments.pdf
http://www.shawneefwiw.com/files/CrimsonRidge/DOI_FWS_comments.pdf
Has Mr. Vaught done anything to encourage the city to also object to this project? He is the council member for Ward III. Or, has he abandoned his neighbors in their fight?
Some additional info on this can be found at:
http://blog.shawneefwiw.com/?p=62
and
http://www.whereisourpark.com/
And as mentioned previously, a web search will come up with even more (and links from the two items above).
The gentleman challenging Vaught for the council seat, Gordon Herron, is also a resident in the Crimson Ridge sub-division. Vaught needs to be replaced with Gordon Herron.
There has been much written in the Kansas City Star and The Shawnee Dispatch about the proposed Crimson Ridge Stream Mitigation Bank locally referred to as the "snake habitat". An on line search will come up with a plethora of articles.
Basically, this is something that the residents of his sub-division are not happy about. Ironically, neither is the US Department of the Interior or the Environmental Protection Agency.
http://www.shawneefwiw.com/files/CrimsonRidge/EPA_comments.pdf
http://www.shawneefwiw.com/files/CrimsonRidge/DOI_FWS_comments.pdf
Has Mr. Vaught done anything to encourage the city to also object to this project? He is the council member for Ward III. Or, has he abandoned his neighbors in their fight?
Some additional info on this can be found at:
http://blog.shawneefwiw.com/?p=62
and
http://www.whereisourpark.com/
And as mentioned previously, a web search will come up with even more (and links from the two items above).
The gentleman challenging Vaught for the council seat, Gordon Herron, is also a resident in the Crimson Ridge sub-division. Vaught needs to be replaced with Gordon Herron.
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Cronyism & Nepotism Start Here
It comes as no surprise that a postcard has been mailed to the voters of Ward II with a statement by Mayor Jeff Meyers supporting Alan Willoughby (his uncle by marriage) for election to the city council for a full term.
This endorsement is a classic case of chutzpah. And if you don't know what that means, please, Google it.
Does the mayor want us to forget that the appointment of Mr. Willoughby to finish out David Morris' term was classified by the JoCo DA as coming about because of "backroom deals" with the mayor being the "ringleader"?
Now the mayor wants the people of Ward II to condone those actions. I hope they don't. Dr. Mike Kemmling is not part of the city hall "inner circle" and that circle needs to be broken.
This endorsement is a classic case of chutzpah. And if you don't know what that means, please, Google it.
Does the mayor want us to forget that the appointment of Mr. Willoughby to finish out David Morris' term was classified by the JoCo DA as coming about because of "backroom deals" with the mayor being the "ringleader"?
Now the mayor wants the people of Ward II to condone those actions. I hope they don't. Dr. Mike Kemmling is not part of the city hall "inner circle" and that circle needs to be broken.
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Michelle Distler - Ward IV
At next week's city election, Michelle Distler is running unopposed for Ward IV councilmember.
It would be nice when the residents of Ward IV go to the polls to vote for other offices that appear on the ballot, that they also cast a vote for Michelle Distler.
Her dedication to working on behalf of her constituents is deserving of a confidence vote.
It would be nice when the residents of Ward IV go to the polls to vote for other offices that appear on the ballot, that they also cast a vote for Michelle Distler.
Her dedication to working on behalf of her constituents is deserving of a confidence vote.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Dan Pflumm for Ward I
On election day, April 2, 2013 methinks the residents of Ward I need to return Dan Pflumm as their councilmember over John Segale.
Recently it needs to be noted, Dan Pflumm was one of two councilmembers who did not go on a junket to Boston for an NLC conference. Six councilmembers (Neighbor, Sawyer,Willoughby, Kuhn, Vaught, and Sandifer), the mayor and city manager did go, and 4 of them took guests.
Even more importantly, Dan Pflumm (along with Michelle Distler) did not participate in the shenanigans at city hall that resulted in the appoinment of Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage) to the city council. The JoCo DA referred to those shenanigans as "backroom deals" with the mayor as the "ringleader". Dan Pflumm stood up to the shenanigans in an attmept to maintain dignity at city hall.
Dan has also been battling to change the way the the landfill impact money the city receives from Deffenbaugh is allocated. Current policy is for the dollars to be split equally between street maintenance and economic development. He wants a larger percentage to go for street maintenance, since that is one item that Shawnee has taken a hit on in the recent past. Dan has also fought for fine tuning the budget as opposed to increasing taxes.
Dan's concern about keeping Shawnee viable as a place to do business is shown by his decision to move his company from a rental office into the former Commerce Bank Building which he bought, right in the middle of downtown Shawnee.
Recently it needs to be noted, Dan Pflumm was one of two councilmembers who did not go on a junket to Boston for an NLC conference. Six councilmembers (Neighbor, Sawyer,Willoughby, Kuhn, Vaught, and Sandifer), the mayor and city manager did go, and 4 of them took guests.
Even more importantly, Dan Pflumm (along with Michelle Distler) did not participate in the shenanigans at city hall that resulted in the appoinment of Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage) to the city council. The JoCo DA referred to those shenanigans as "backroom deals" with the mayor as the "ringleader". Dan Pflumm stood up to the shenanigans in an attmept to maintain dignity at city hall.
Dan has also been battling to change the way the the landfill impact money the city receives from Deffenbaugh is allocated. Current policy is for the dollars to be split equally between street maintenance and economic development. He wants a larger percentage to go for street maintenance, since that is one item that Shawnee has taken a hit on in the recent past. Dan has also fought for fine tuning the budget as opposed to increasing taxes.
Dan's concern about keeping Shawnee viable as a place to do business is shown by his decision to move his company from a rental office into the former Commerce Bank Building which he bought, right in the middle of downtown Shawnee.
Saturday, March 23, 2013
More Vaught Arrogance & Hypocrisy
Jeff Vaught, the classic arrogant example of someone who says "do as I say, not as I do"
In the April 2012 election he was highly critical of the idea of folks from outside of Shawnee getting involved in Shawnee elections.
So, go to his web site and as of this morning you will see five endorsements:
Tom Zarda
Matt Hughes
Don Julian
Ed Alexander
Jerry Moran
From what I can tell, only Mr. Zarda is a Shawnee resident, and I believe one of the other gentlemen may live out of state. Now it's also ironic that last year he was critical of state reps (who are Shawnee residents) from getting involved in city elections......yet he has no problems with Mr Moran who eventhough he is a US Senator, he is definitely not a Shawnee resident. Get all the endorsements you want, just don't be hypocritical and set different "ground rules" for yourself than you try and set for others.
Also on his site he says that he:
In the April 2012 election he was highly critical of the idea of folks from outside of Shawnee getting involved in Shawnee elections.
So, go to his web site and as of this morning you will see five endorsements:
Tom Zarda
Matt Hughes
Don Julian
Ed Alexander
Jerry Moran
From what I can tell, only Mr. Zarda is a Shawnee resident, and I believe one of the other gentlemen may live out of state. Now it's also ironic that last year he was critical of state reps (who are Shawnee residents) from getting involved in city elections......yet he has no problems with Mr Moran who eventhough he is a US Senator, he is definitely not a Shawnee resident. Get all the endorsements you want, just don't be hypocritical and set different "ground rules" for yourself than you try and set for others.
Also on his site he says that he:
"Led the move to eliminate the city's long term retirement
liabilities by moving away from a defined benefit plan and migrating to a
defined contribution plan."
Did he? Or was that being worked on way before he was even on the council? There are other items he seems to be taking credit for that I would question.
Humorous side bar: When referring to people who serve in the legislature, they are "legislators", not "legislatures". As in: "........attends the Legislative Breakfast Series where state legislatures discuss bills and actions currently moving through Topeka."
This man does not deserve to be returned to the city council...........ya gotta vote for Gordon Herron on April 2, 2013.
This man does not deserve to be returned to the city council...........ya gotta vote for Gordon Herron on April 2, 2013.
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Willoughby Avoids Backing Up Statement
Ah yes, it seems like Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage) is joining that group of individuals who, when asked a direct question avoid a direct answer.
Background: At last week's forum between him and Dr. Mike Kemmling, Willoughby was asked if he thought it was ok for the city to send 8 people to Boston for a convention (6 council members, the mayor and the city manager). He thought that was fine. He then proceeded to offer the info that 4 of the folks (he being one) had brought guests (at no cost to the city). He then proceeded to volunteer that the city had been asked about doubling up attendees in hotel rooms and that couldn't be done, because when they got backed they looked it up and it was "illegal".
Illegal? It's illegal to double up in hotel rooms to save money. Well, illegal means a violation of law. So, I did some more research, and couldn't find anything that said it was illegal to double up meeting attendees. I did find some references that some companies, and government agencies have personnel policies against it, but I did not find anything that said it was illegal.
So, I did what any ordinary citizen would do. I sent Willoughby an email asking him to provide the information as to where this practice was illegal. Now that should have been easy for him to do, since, according to him "they" looked it up upon returning from Boston. So, it should have been readily accessible.
Well, Willoughby hasn't responded. It's not nice to ignore questions..............it's not nice to make a statement and then not being able to back it up.
Willoughby's appointment to the council was a farce. He does not deserve to be elected to a full term.
Background: At last week's forum between him and Dr. Mike Kemmling, Willoughby was asked if he thought it was ok for the city to send 8 people to Boston for a convention (6 council members, the mayor and the city manager). He thought that was fine. He then proceeded to offer the info that 4 of the folks (he being one) had brought guests (at no cost to the city). He then proceeded to volunteer that the city had been asked about doubling up attendees in hotel rooms and that couldn't be done, because when they got backed they looked it up and it was "illegal".
Illegal? It's illegal to double up in hotel rooms to save money. Well, illegal means a violation of law. So, I did some more research, and couldn't find anything that said it was illegal to double up meeting attendees. I did find some references that some companies, and government agencies have personnel policies against it, but I did not find anything that said it was illegal.
So, I did what any ordinary citizen would do. I sent Willoughby an email asking him to provide the information as to where this practice was illegal. Now that should have been easy for him to do, since, according to him "they" looked it up upon returning from Boston. So, it should have been readily accessible.
Well, Willoughby hasn't responded. It's not nice to ignore questions..............it's not nice to make a statement and then not being able to back it up.
Willoughby's appointment to the council was a farce. He does not deserve to be elected to a full term.
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Jeff Vaught Insults Another Councilmember
There was a very interesting exchange, 3/5/13 at the city council meeting, between councilmembers Jeff Vaught and Neal Sawyer.
During a discussion on an item, Mr Sawyer made reference to how the council had sold the idea of the CID at 10 Quivira Plaza to the public (a previous incentive package). Apparently Vaught took exception to the the expression "sold". This is ironic, since "selling" is Vaught's business. He never misses an opportunity to publicly announce at a council meeting that "I am in commercial real estate". Heck, everything that comes before the council is an item that is being sold. People are always trying to "sell" the idea of approving or disapproving something. I guess this is just another simple word that Vaught has a problem understanding.
Anyway, view the video clip below. Listen carefully and you will hear Vaught refer to Sawyer as being juvenile And then Sawyer saying that with Vaught everything is juvenile. Vaught's belittling of Sawyer is uncalled for, yet he belittles many people from his position on the dais, including members of the public. Ironically, he used to accuse his predecessor of impolite behavior towards other members of the council. Vaught does not, IMHO, present a positive image for the city council. He presents himself as a self effacing bully, intent on belittling people. With his constant reminders to us of what he does for a living I've often wondered, does Vaught want to be on the council to serve Shawnee and its citizens, or is he in it for his own personal aggrandizement?
This is a good reason to vote Vaught out and vote for his opponent, Gordon Herron on the April 2, election for council member in Ward III.
DTJVSD
During a discussion on an item, Mr Sawyer made reference to how the council had sold the idea of the CID at 10 Quivira Plaza to the public (a previous incentive package). Apparently Vaught took exception to the the expression "sold". This is ironic, since "selling" is Vaught's business. He never misses an opportunity to publicly announce at a council meeting that "I am in commercial real estate". Heck, everything that comes before the council is an item that is being sold. People are always trying to "sell" the idea of approving or disapproving something. I guess this is just another simple word that Vaught has a problem understanding.
Anyway, view the video clip below. Listen carefully and you will hear Vaught refer to Sawyer as being juvenile And then Sawyer saying that with Vaught everything is juvenile. Vaught's belittling of Sawyer is uncalled for, yet he belittles many people from his position on the dais, including members of the public. Ironically, he used to accuse his predecessor of impolite behavior towards other members of the council. Vaught does not, IMHO, present a positive image for the city council. He presents himself as a self effacing bully, intent on belittling people. With his constant reminders to us of what he does for a living I've often wondered, does Vaught want to be on the council to serve Shawnee and its citizens, or is he in it for his own personal aggrandizement?
This is a good reason to vote Vaught out and vote for his opponent, Gordon Herron on the April 2, election for council member in Ward III.
DTJVSD
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Last Night's Forum Kemmling/Willoughby
Last night there was a forum in downtown Shawnee which was organized by former councilmember David Morris and Hartman Hardware owner Mike Unterreiner. Attorney Kevin Bennett served as moderator. This was the first attempt at something like this in Ward II and these three are to be congratulated for even taking on the task.
So, what happened? Well, you had to be there to appreciate it. Mike Kemmling , for the most part gave specific answers to questions. Remember, the questions were basically asking these two what their thoughts/positions were on a variety of topics. Most of the time Alan Willoughby referred to a manila folder he had (complete with tabbed pages) and rather than his ideas, thoughts and positions rattled off inconsequential statistics. Wonder who put that together for him?
Anyway, he did answer some of the questions directly. One of them pertained to the mayor not permitting public input at the council meeting where he was appointed to the council. He apparently thought it was OK for no public input to be allowed. Ironically, he made the statement a number of times that the council "elected" him. Oh boy, another person that does not understand the way local government works. The council did not "elect" him, it appointed him to fill an unexpired term caused by a resignation. Maybe he doesn't realize that he is NOT running for reelection, but for election to a full term. Kemmling thought it was not right for the mayor to prohibit citizen input and cited precedences of citizen input, to include the appointment of Jim Neighbor a few years ago.
There was one topic of discussion where Willoughby was not sure of the expiration of the parks and pipes tax. What did he do when he wasn't sure of that date? He shouted out to councilmember Sawyer who was in the back of the room for verification. Hey, Uncle Alan (he is the mayor's uncle by marriage) this was supposed to be between you and Mike Kemmling. If you don't know an answer say so. Do not shout out for third party assistance. Going forward, if something like this happens again I would expect the moderator not to permit the person in the audience to answer (learning curve time).
When the question csme up concerning the city recently sending 8 people to Boston for a National League of Cities conference, Mike Kemmling thought that two people would have been enough, and that those two could bring back the info to the others. Alan Willoughby thought that sending eight people was ok (6 council members, he was one of them, the city manager and the mayor).
I sincerely hope that the citizens of Ward II send a message to city hall that they no longer want cronyism in city government. One way to do that is to vote for Mike Kemmling.
So, what happened? Well, you had to be there to appreciate it. Mike Kemmling , for the most part gave specific answers to questions. Remember, the questions were basically asking these two what their thoughts/positions were on a variety of topics. Most of the time Alan Willoughby referred to a manila folder he had (complete with tabbed pages) and rather than his ideas, thoughts and positions rattled off inconsequential statistics. Wonder who put that together for him?
Anyway, he did answer some of the questions directly. One of them pertained to the mayor not permitting public input at the council meeting where he was appointed to the council. He apparently thought it was OK for no public input to be allowed. Ironically, he made the statement a number of times that the council "elected" him. Oh boy, another person that does not understand the way local government works. The council did not "elect" him, it appointed him to fill an unexpired term caused by a resignation. Maybe he doesn't realize that he is NOT running for reelection, but for election to a full term. Kemmling thought it was not right for the mayor to prohibit citizen input and cited precedences of citizen input, to include the appointment of Jim Neighbor a few years ago.
There was one topic of discussion where Willoughby was not sure of the expiration of the parks and pipes tax. What did he do when he wasn't sure of that date? He shouted out to councilmember Sawyer who was in the back of the room for verification. Hey, Uncle Alan (he is the mayor's uncle by marriage) this was supposed to be between you and Mike Kemmling. If you don't know an answer say so. Do not shout out for third party assistance. Going forward, if something like this happens again I would expect the moderator not to permit the person in the audience to answer (learning curve time).
When the question csme up concerning the city recently sending 8 people to Boston for a National League of Cities conference, Mike Kemmling thought that two people would have been enough, and that those two could bring back the info to the others. Alan Willoughby thought that sending eight people was ok (6 council members, he was one of them, the city manager and the mayor).
I sincerely hope that the citizens of Ward II send a message to city hall that they no longer want cronyism in city government. One way to do that is to vote for Mike Kemmling.
Sunday, March 10, 2013
Ward 3 Herron vs Vaught
I sincerely hope that the voters of Ward 3 in Shawnee elect Gordon Herron to replace Jeff Vaught as their council member. Eventhough it is the voters of that ward that determine the councilmember, it is important to remember that when any council member sits on the council and acts, he or she is acting on behalf of the entire city, not just one ward. It is my opinion that Jeff Vaught is not qualified to act on behalf of the City of Shawnee.
Let's look at just 3 reasons right now:
1. Jeff Vaught was highly complicit in the appointment of Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage) to replace David Morris. This whole thing was, as the District Attorney said, "the result of backroom deals". Ironically, if you read the DA's letter, Vaught actually was inclined to vote for Kemmling who garnered almost 50% of the vote in a previous election. Why did he change and vote for Uncle Alan? Was it arm twisting by the mayor (the "ringleader" according to the DA)? See and hear Jeff Vaught's ridiculous reason for not voting for Kemmling and the hypocrisy of that reasoning by clicking here: http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2012/07/vaughts-food-for-thought-hypocrisy.html
2. How about the fact that Jeff Vaught does not even understand his job? In his arrogant, self effacing bravado he feels that other council members have to go through him. Want proof? Read this: http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2013/01/proof-jeff-vaught-does-not-understand.html
3. Jeff Vaught's support of the CID for 10 Quivira Plaza showed little caring for the people most affected, the folks in Ward 2. This plan, increases the sales tax in that shopping center so the owner can make improvements. Problem is, the merchant with the largest volume of business is a grocery store and the neighborhood is one of the more modest income areas of the city.
Again I sincerely hope folks support Gordon Herron over Jeff Vaught. Support can be helping to hand out literature, placing yard signs, and yes, making contributions to Gordon's campaign. Regardless of where you live, if you feel like I do that Vaught has to go, please support Gordon Herron. Visit his web site at: http://herronforshawnee.com/
Let's look at just 3 reasons right now:
1. Jeff Vaught was highly complicit in the appointment of Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage) to replace David Morris. This whole thing was, as the District Attorney said, "the result of backroom deals". Ironically, if you read the DA's letter, Vaught actually was inclined to vote for Kemmling who garnered almost 50% of the vote in a previous election. Why did he change and vote for Uncle Alan? Was it arm twisting by the mayor (the "ringleader" according to the DA)? See and hear Jeff Vaught's ridiculous reason for not voting for Kemmling and the hypocrisy of that reasoning by clicking here: http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2012/07/vaughts-food-for-thought-hypocrisy.html
2. How about the fact that Jeff Vaught does not even understand his job? In his arrogant, self effacing bravado he feels that other council members have to go through him. Want proof? Read this: http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2013/01/proof-jeff-vaught-does-not-understand.html
3. Jeff Vaught's support of the CID for 10 Quivira Plaza showed little caring for the people most affected, the folks in Ward 2. This plan, increases the sales tax in that shopping center so the owner can make improvements. Problem is, the merchant with the largest volume of business is a grocery store and the neighborhood is one of the more modest income areas of the city.
Again I sincerely hope folks support Gordon Herron over Jeff Vaught. Support can be helping to hand out literature, placing yard signs, and yes, making contributions to Gordon's campaign. Regardless of where you live, if you feel like I do that Vaught has to go, please support Gordon Herron. Visit his web site at: http://herronforshawnee.com/
Thursday, March 07, 2013
Ward 2 Candidates Forum
Dr Mike Kemmling, winner of the recent Ward 2 primary and Alan Willoughby who came in second will appear at a forum on Tuesday, 3/12/13 at 7:00PM.
The location is 11009, just to the west of Pegah's Restaurant (across the street from Hartman Hardware).
More info is at http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/mar/05/ward-2-candidate-forum-set-wednesday-evening/
The location is 11009, just to the west of Pegah's Restaurant (across the street from Hartman Hardware).
More info is at http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2013/mar/05/ward-2-candidate-forum-set-wednesday-evening/
Wednesday, March 06, 2013
Shawnee PD Receives Award From AAA
At Tuesday's 3/5/13 the Shawnee PD received the Gold Community Traffic
Safety Award from AAA Kansas.
The purpose of the award is to encourage communities to address local traffic safety issues in a coordinated and cost-effective way. Communities are scored on the success of their efforts in conducting traffic safety enforcement, education and engineering programs. Examples of these traffic safety programs are Data Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety, “Click It or Ticket” deployments, and sobriety checklanes and saturation patrols to deter impaired driving.
For 2012, Shawnee qualified for a GOLD Award. The GOLD award is given to communities that implement programs and projects that demonstrate SUPERIOR efforts at addressing local traffic safety issues. They accomplished this through expanded traffic safety programming.
The Shawnee Police Department also conducted high-visibility vehicle and motorcycle enforcement to combat aggressive drivers and hazardous driving, Operation Impact and nighttime seat belt enforcement. They even connected with young drivers through the "Smart Choices" program in the high schools to improve seat belt use, and DUI and texting while driving prevention education.
The award was presented to Sergeant Jim Baker and Traffic Safety Officers Matt Klein, Steve Walsh, Matt Sumpter, and Nate Karlin with the 2012 Kansas Triple A Community Traffic Safety GOLD Award. Congratulations on a job well done.
Safety Award from AAA Kansas.
The purpose of the award is to encourage communities to address local traffic safety issues in a coordinated and cost-effective way. Communities are scored on the success of their efforts in conducting traffic safety enforcement, education and engineering programs. Examples of these traffic safety programs are Data Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety, “Click It or Ticket” deployments, and sobriety checklanes and saturation patrols to deter impaired driving.
For 2012, Shawnee qualified for a GOLD Award. The GOLD award is given to communities that implement programs and projects that demonstrate SUPERIOR efforts at addressing local traffic safety issues. They accomplished this through expanded traffic safety programming.
The Shawnee Police Department also conducted high-visibility vehicle and motorcycle enforcement to combat aggressive drivers and hazardous driving, Operation Impact and nighttime seat belt enforcement. They even connected with young drivers through the "Smart Choices" program in the high schools to improve seat belt use, and DUI and texting while driving prevention education.
The award was presented to Sergeant Jim Baker and Traffic Safety Officers Matt Klein, Steve Walsh, Matt Sumpter, and Nate Karlin with the 2012 Kansas Triple A Community Traffic Safety GOLD Award. Congratulations on a job well done.
St Patty's Day & Heroes Pull
Don't forget after the St. Patrick's Day Parade, Sunday March 10th at 2PM there will be a charity event at the Splash Cove parking lot (Johnson Drive and King St in downtown Shawnee)
Various teams have been formed and will attempt to pull a police armored vehicle and a firetruck 50 feet.
This is being done to raise money for Kansas Special Olympics. All money raised stays in Kansas and helps the Special Olympics .
So, what about donating. Each team member is trying to get as many doantions as possible, and there is a little challenge going on to see who can raise the most money.
One of the teams is the City Hall Crusaders and their page is http://heroespull.ksso.org/2013/crusaders/ You can click on the name of an individual team member and make your donation in their name. I chose to make mine on behalf of my Ward 4 councilmember Michelle Distler, and her page can be accessed directly at http://heroespull.ksso.org/2013/crusaders/michelledistler/
Join in..........the donations don't have to be big..............every bit helps............it's for a good cause.........and then turn out on the 10th of March to cheer the team on............I can hardly wait to see them pulling those vehicles.
Side note: If you're bashful, the donation page (since this is a charity) has a box that you can check to be anonymous.
Various teams have been formed and will attempt to pull a police armored vehicle and a firetruck 50 feet.
This is being done to raise money for Kansas Special Olympics. All money raised stays in Kansas and helps the Special Olympics .
So, what about donating. Each team member is trying to get as many doantions as possible, and there is a little challenge going on to see who can raise the most money.
One of the teams is the City Hall Crusaders and their page is http://heroespull.ksso.org/2013/crusaders/ You can click on the name of an individual team member and make your donation in their name. I chose to make mine on behalf of my Ward 4 councilmember Michelle Distler, and her page can be accessed directly at http://heroespull.ksso.org/2013/crusaders/michelledistler/
Join in..........the donations don't have to be big..............every bit helps............it's for a good cause.........and then turn out on the 10th of March to cheer the team on............I can hardly wait to see them pulling those vehicles.
Side note: If you're bashful, the donation page (since this is a charity) has a box that you can check to be anonymous.
Sunday, March 03, 2013
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Ward II Primary Election Results
OK, the results are in:
Mike Kemmling.................197
Alan Willoughby................138
Jill Y Reed............................52
Trishelle Miller.....................22
So, now what happens? Well, Dr. Mike Kemmling and Alan Willoughby will now face off in the general election on April 2, 2013.
Is there a possibility that the citizens of Ward II are thoroughly disgusted with the way that Willoughby, the mayor's uncle by marriage, was appointed to the council to finsih out the term of David Morris who had resigned the seat?
It would be nice if the people in Ward II elected Mike Kemmling in April, and showed that they no longer wanted to put up with "backroom deals" initiated by the mayor as "ringleader", (terms used by JoCo District Attorney Howe in his letter about the KOMA violation investigation).
Mike Kemmling.................197
Alan Willoughby................138
Jill Y Reed............................52
Trishelle Miller.....................22
So, now what happens? Well, Dr. Mike Kemmling and Alan Willoughby will now face off in the general election on April 2, 2013.
Is there a possibility that the citizens of Ward II are thoroughly disgusted with the way that Willoughby, the mayor's uncle by marriage, was appointed to the council to finsih out the term of David Morris who had resigned the seat?
It would be nice if the people in Ward II elected Mike Kemmling in April, and showed that they no longer wanted to put up with "backroom deals" initiated by the mayor as "ringleader", (terms used by JoCo District Attorney Howe in his letter about the KOMA violation investigation).
Monday, February 25, 2013
Primary Voting Times And Location Changes
These changes are for the Ward II Shawnee primary election. If you live in Ward II please make a note of these changes. If you know someone who lives in Ward II who may not have heard the news please pass this on.
Early voting has been extended until 7:00PM this evening, Mon 2/25. This is for in person voting at the JoCo Election Office 2101 E Kansas City Road, Olathe 66061.
Tomorrow, Tue 2/26, because of the weather all Ward II Shawnee primary voting will be held at
Early voting has been extended until 7:00PM this evening, Mon 2/25. This is for in person voting at the JoCo Election Office 2101 E Kansas City Road, Olathe 66061.
Tomorrow, Tue 2/26, because of the weather all Ward II Shawnee primary voting will be held at
Merriam Christian Church 9401 Johnson Drive Merriam, KS
from 7:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m.
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Voting and Expected Snow Storm
With a possible snow storm coming late Monday, this is a reminder that folks can still vote early, on Monday instead of Tuesday:
From 9 am until 12:00 noon, at the Johnson County Election
office located at 2101 East Kansas City Road, Olathe, KS
Less Than 48 Hours To Go
In less than 48 hours, the polls will open in Ward II in Shawnee for the primary election for city council. The election will narrow a four person field down to two, with the two biggest vote getters going on to the general election on April 2.
Dr. Mike Kemmling is undeniably the best qualified for this position. He proved it in the last election that he had the confidence of a large number of the Ward's voters since he barly lost to Neal Sawyer by only 11 votes.
When David Morris resigned, and that position came open, instead of appointing an individual that the voters wanted the city council gave the job to the mayor's uncle by marriage, Alan Willoughby.
And that was done, without allowing public input, and according to the JoCo DA, the result of "backroom deals" with the mayor as the "ringleader".
If you'd like to read the back up documentation for that, go here:
http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2013/01/das-statement-on-shawnee-koma-violation.html
Dr. Mike Kemmling is undeniably the best qualified for this position. He proved it in the last election that he had the confidence of a large number of the Ward's voters since he barly lost to Neal Sawyer by only 11 votes.
When David Morris resigned, and that position came open, instead of appointing an individual that the voters wanted the city council gave the job to the mayor's uncle by marriage, Alan Willoughby.
And that was done, without allowing public input, and according to the JoCo DA, the result of "backroom deals" with the mayor as the "ringleader".
If you'd like to read the back up documentation for that, go here:
http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2013/01/das-statement-on-shawnee-koma-violation.html
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Kemmling for Ward II
About a week and a half ago I stated on this blog why I thought Mike Kemmling deserved the votes of the citizens in the Ward II primary to be held next Tuesday, 2/26/13 http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2013/02/ward-2-primary-coming-feb-26-2013.html
I still feel that way and hope the readers of this blog agree.
Check out Mike's page at http://mikekemmling.blogspot.com/
I still feel that way and hope the readers of this blog agree.
Check out Mike's page at http://mikekemmling.blogspot.com/
Friday, February 15, 2013
Dealing with a COW
I wrote about this during the last election cycle. What is a COW? A COW is a "councilmember from other ward"
OK, let me explain. We each live in wards in Shawnee. We vote for councilmembers to represent us. When the council meets and votes on items they are representing the entire city.
Now let's say that there is a councilmember in another ward that you feel does not vote for what you feel is right. Well, you cannot vote for that person's opponent. But, you can help that person's opponent. You can contribute to the other person's campaign. You can help distribute flyers. You can make phone calls for them. You do NOT have to live in the ward to do those things.
Remember, every coucnilmember represents you. So, if you are unhappy with the way a COW functions, support their opponent. The reverse is also true. If you feel that a COW truly represents your feelings and beliefs, then you can do the same things to help them get reelected.
OK, let me explain. We each live in wards in Shawnee. We vote for councilmembers to represent us. When the council meets and votes on items they are representing the entire city.
Now let's say that there is a councilmember in another ward that you feel does not vote for what you feel is right. Well, you cannot vote for that person's opponent. But, you can help that person's opponent. You can contribute to the other person's campaign. You can help distribute flyers. You can make phone calls for them. You do NOT have to live in the ward to do those things.
Remember, every coucnilmember represents you. So, if you are unhappy with the way a COW functions, support their opponent. The reverse is also true. If you feel that a COW truly represents your feelings and beliefs, then you can do the same things to help them get reelected.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Shawnee Heroes Pull
OK, here's the deal. After the St. Patrick's Day Parade, Sunday March 10th at 2PM there will be a charity event at the Splash Cove parking lot (Johnson Drive and King St in downtown Shawnee)
Various teams have been formed and will attempt to pull a police armored vehicle and a firetruck 50 feet.
This is being done to raise money for Kansas Special Olympics. All money raised stays in Kansas and helps the Special Olympics Athletes with physical fitness training and sports programs, health and nuitrition programs, and leadership development. Special Olympics is not just about the sports, but it uses sports to build the athletes' confidence, self esteem, physical well being, and gives them the opportunities to be doing things they normally would not have.
OK, so what about donating. Each team member is trying to get as many doantions as possible, and there is a little challenge going on to see who can raise the most money.
One of the teams is the City Hall Crusaders and their page is http://heroespull.ksso.org/2013/crusaders/
You can click on the name of an individual team member and make your donation in their name. I chose to make mine on behalf of my Ward 4 councilmember Michelle Distler, and her page can be accessed directly at http://heroespull.ksso.org/2013/crusaders/michelledistler/
Join in..........the donations don't have to be big..............every bit helps............it's for a good cause.........and then turn out on the 10th of March to cheer the team on............I can hardly wait to see them pulling those vehicles.
Side note: If you're bashful, the donation page (since this is a charity) has a box that you can check to be anonymous.
Various teams have been formed and will attempt to pull a police armored vehicle and a firetruck 50 feet.
This is being done to raise money for Kansas Special Olympics. All money raised stays in Kansas and helps the Special Olympics Athletes with physical fitness training and sports programs, health and nuitrition programs, and leadership development. Special Olympics is not just about the sports, but it uses sports to build the athletes' confidence, self esteem, physical well being, and gives them the opportunities to be doing things they normally would not have.
OK, so what about donating. Each team member is trying to get as many doantions as possible, and there is a little challenge going on to see who can raise the most money.
One of the teams is the City Hall Crusaders and their page is http://heroespull.ksso.org/2013/crusaders/
You can click on the name of an individual team member and make your donation in their name. I chose to make mine on behalf of my Ward 4 councilmember Michelle Distler, and her page can be accessed directly at http://heroespull.ksso.org/2013/crusaders/michelledistler/
Join in..........the donations don't have to be big..............every bit helps............it's for a good cause.........and then turn out on the 10th of March to cheer the team on............I can hardly wait to see them pulling those vehicles.
Side note: If you're bashful, the donation page (since this is a charity) has a box that you can check to be anonymous.
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Ward 2 Primary Coming Feb 26, 2013
Since four individuals have filed for the Ward 2 council seat in Shawnee there will be a primary on Tuesday, Feb 26, 2013. The top two vote getters will move on to the general election on Apr 2, 2013.
Let's see what we have here:
Mike Kemmling ran against Neal Sawyer last April and only lost by 11 votes, 661-650. Clearly there were many citizens in ward 2 who supported his candidacy. A very intelligent individual, Dr. Kemmling has his dental office in Shawnee.
A couple of months after that election, David Morris the other ward 2 counilmember at the time resigned because of a conflict with the city manager. Five individuals, including Mike Kemmling applied to fill the remaining time for the position. The selection was to be made at a special city council meeting.
Alan Willoughby was selected by the council to fill the unexpired portion of Mr. Morris' term. Ironically four members of the council ignored the strong support that Kemmling had received in the election and chose Willoughby, the uncle by marriage of the mayor. Additionally, the mayor did not allow public comments/input at the special meeting.
Subsequent to that selection a complaint was filed that Mr. Willoughby's appointment may have violated the Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA) because discussions were held prior to the meeting.
The JoCo DA stated that "KOMA was enacted to prohibit the 'backroom' deals that were going on in Shawnee."
The DA also said " the spirit of KOMA was violated" and that the the actions of the mayor, as ringleader, were found to be "unacceptable".
Jill Y Reed and Trishelle Miller have also filed to run but I can't find much about either one.
Personally, I sincerely hope that the voters of Ward 2 elect Mike Kemmling.
Sidebar: With regards to citizen input at meetings, by not allowing it at the special council meeting it is my opinion that the mayor violated the oath he took to defend the Constitution of the State of Kansas.
Section 3, of the Bill of Rights of the Kansas Constitution says:
3. Right of peaceable assembly; petition. The people have the right to assemble, in a peaceable manner, to consult for their common good, to instruct their representatives, and to petition the government, or any department thereof, for the redress of grievances.
Let's see what we have here:
Mike Kemmling ran against Neal Sawyer last April and only lost by 11 votes, 661-650. Clearly there were many citizens in ward 2 who supported his candidacy. A very intelligent individual, Dr. Kemmling has his dental office in Shawnee.
A couple of months after that election, David Morris the other ward 2 counilmember at the time resigned because of a conflict with the city manager. Five individuals, including Mike Kemmling applied to fill the remaining time for the position. The selection was to be made at a special city council meeting.
Alan Willoughby was selected by the council to fill the unexpired portion of Mr. Morris' term. Ironically four members of the council ignored the strong support that Kemmling had received in the election and chose Willoughby, the uncle by marriage of the mayor. Additionally, the mayor did not allow public comments/input at the special meeting.
Subsequent to that selection a complaint was filed that Mr. Willoughby's appointment may have violated the Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA) because discussions were held prior to the meeting.
The JoCo DA stated that "KOMA was enacted to prohibit the 'backroom' deals that were going on in Shawnee."
The DA also said " the spirit of KOMA was violated" and that the the actions of the mayor, as ringleader, were found to be "unacceptable".
Jill Y Reed and Trishelle Miller have also filed to run but I can't find much about either one.
Personally, I sincerely hope that the voters of Ward 2 elect Mike Kemmling.
Sidebar: With regards to citizen input at meetings, by not allowing it at the special council meeting it is my opinion that the mayor violated the oath he took to defend the Constitution of the State of Kansas.
Section 3, of the Bill of Rights of the Kansas Constitution says:
3. Right of peaceable assembly; petition. The people have the right to assemble, in a peaceable manner, to consult for their common good, to instruct their representatives, and to petition the government, or any department thereof, for the redress of grievances.
Friday, February 01, 2013
KC Star Editorial About the KOMA Situation
The KC Star's editorial can be read at http://www.kansascity.com/2013/01/31/4042455/wrist-slaps-for-open-meetings.html
Please read the full editorial at the above link................quoted below are two of the paragraphs:
The latest incident involved Shawnee Mayor Jeff Meyers and the City Council members who basically agreed on a deal in private to elect the mayor’s uncle to the council in 2012, according to Howe. (my note: the councilmembers were Neighbor, Sandifer, Kuhn and Vaught)
Ultimately, Meyers and all the other politicians who have abused the public trust need to stop bellyaching about the open meetings law and start obeying it.
I'm just wondering if Councilmember Vaught is going to treat us to a repeat of one of his diatribes about how it's not right for the media to publish negative items about Shawnee. Hey Vaught, if ya don't want negative items appearing in the media don't do negative things. Don't appoint someone to the council as the result of a "backroom deal" (the DA's term, not mine).
Please read the full editorial at the above link................quoted below are two of the paragraphs:
The latest incident involved Shawnee Mayor Jeff Meyers and the City Council members who basically agreed on a deal in private to elect the mayor’s uncle to the council in 2012, according to Howe. (my note: the councilmembers were Neighbor, Sandifer, Kuhn and Vaught)
Ultimately, Meyers and all the other politicians who have abused the public trust need to stop bellyaching about the open meetings law and start obeying it.
I'm just wondering if Councilmember Vaught is going to treat us to a repeat of one of his diatribes about how it's not right for the media to publish negative items about Shawnee. Hey Vaught, if ya don't want negative items appearing in the media don't do negative things. Don't appoint someone to the council as the result of a "backroom deal" (the DA's term, not mine).
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
