Until a few weeks ago he was the city manager in Osawatomie Kansas. It's been all over Miami County that he is moving north to become finance director here in Shawnee.
Wonder when the official announcement will be made? Oh well. Mr. Cawby has a pretty impressive resumé, which can be viewed on Linked In
He will be replacing Maureen Rogers who retired after 7 years with Shawnee. That does bring up some questions. While Ms. Rogers was with Shawnee the city received various awards and accolades for its financial reports, departmental audits etc. Her retirement seemed to come rather suddenly without much notice. Usually a department director gives a substantial amount of notice. Also, it does not appear that the usual retirement party was held at city hall. What happened here? Was Ms. Rogers forced into an early retirement? It all seems strange, again, in view of the various positive reports and items of recognition the department received while she was here. Maybe someday we'll find out.
Thursday, August 29, 2019
Wednesday, August 28, 2019
Potential Property Tax Problems With Big Box Retailers
Below is an email I sent to the governing body of Shawnee today. The actions (or inactions) of the city manager are IMHO, inexcusable.
T he situation has been ongoing apparently for quite some
time. So, that now begs answers to the
following questions:
This low key approach and not keeping the citizens informed
of this item, is IMHO an act of misfeasance on the part of the city
manager. Now, before anybody on the
council starts to declare that “we have the greatest staff in the metro”,
realize that by doing so you would be condoning the withholding of this
information from the public. This is
outrageous.
Good afternoon,
Some of you may recall that I addressed the council in July
about this problem. At the time it was
learned that Wal Mart had won an appeal of their property tax based on what
they contended was an erroneous method of calculating their taxes by JoCo
It was indicated that if their appeal is upheld it could
have severe consequences on taxes received by the city and county by not just
Wal Mart but other retailers that were taxed the same way (Lowes, Home Depot,
Walgreens etc.) This could also involve
the refunding of substantial sums of money to these businesses. For those that are not aware of what this
entailed, apparently JoCo had been basing property taxes on sales as opposed to
actual property valuations.
The more I have thought about this issue, the more upset I
have become with staff, particularly the city manager. When queried, he responded that the situation
was being watched closely.
1. Why weren’t the
citizens of Shawnee told of this situation prior to the vote on the community
center? Was it because that would have
been just one more reason for the voters not to approve it?
2. Why wasn’t the
information presented in the open council budget sessions so that the public
could know about it. Presentations about
this item were made to the council in OP.
Presentation about this item was made to the BOCC in open session.
I proposed in July some actions that it was felt were
necessary to keep the citizens of Shawnee properly informed on this
matter. I will reiterate those proposals
at this time:
1. The city council
must, in open session, direct the city manager to provide in January after the
beginning of the new council session and at the beginning of the budget process
an outline of the current status of the item as what the courts have decided up
to that time.
2. Utilizing the same
time line as above the city manager needs to prepare various “what if”
scenarios. Even though specific dollar
amounts are not currently available, there should be enough raw data available to
project various possibilities. It is
done for other items all the time. Heck,
the budget is one big “what if” scenario.
3. The council needs
to admonish the city manager that keeping this info from the citizens is not
good government, nor is it transparent government.
Sunday, August 18, 2019
Dawn Rattan - $1000 Campaign Contribution - For Make Up
I've seen some strange listings on campaign finance reports, but this one takes the cake. Or is that pancake makeup?
We are talking about Dawn Rattan, candidate for the Ward 3 full term council seat. In her financial report filed 7/29/19 she listed an in kind contribution from Smash Glam at 3941 Troost Ave KCMO for $1000 for "makeup for pictures". That must have been some makeup job.
Anyway, let's talk about the legalities of in kind contributions. According to Kansas state law the maximum amount of an in kind contribution for a candidate in a Shawnee city council race is $500 per reporting period (primary/general) Same as an actual cash contribution. Also, if a party gives both an in kind and an actual cash contribution during a reporting period the total cannot exceed the $500 maximum (example $200 in kind and $300 cash). Additionally, according to State law a candidate cannot take an overage contribution in one period and split it over multiple reporting periods. That means that the $1000 in kind from Smash glam cannot be split $500/primary and $500/general. Now, the state Government Ethics Commission reviews these filings. Wonder what they are going to do? Will she have to refund $500 to the contributor? Will she have to wash off the make up? Which begs the question: How long does a $1000 make up job stay on one's face? How much did her appearance need changing?
We are talking about Dawn Rattan, candidate for the Ward 3 full term council seat. In her financial report filed 7/29/19 she listed an in kind contribution from Smash Glam at 3941 Troost Ave KCMO for $1000 for "makeup for pictures". That must have been some makeup job.
Anyway, let's talk about the legalities of in kind contributions. According to Kansas state law the maximum amount of an in kind contribution for a candidate in a Shawnee city council race is $500 per reporting period (primary/general) Same as an actual cash contribution. Also, if a party gives both an in kind and an actual cash contribution during a reporting period the total cannot exceed the $500 maximum (example $200 in kind and $300 cash). Additionally, according to State law a candidate cannot take an overage contribution in one period and split it over multiple reporting periods. That means that the $1000 in kind from Smash glam cannot be split $500/primary and $500/general. Now, the state Government Ethics Commission reviews these filings. Wonder what they are going to do? Will she have to refund $500 to the contributor? Will she have to wash off the make up? Which begs the question: How long does a $1000 make up job stay on one's face? How much did her appearance need changing?
Wednesday, August 14, 2019
Sign Sign Everywhere a Sign - Stephanie Meyer Pick Up Your Signs
Well, the primaries are over.
With regards to the mayoral candidates:
Mayor Michelle Signs - Signs have been removed
Dawn Tubbesing - Signs have been removed
Ajay Sood - Signs have been removed
Stephanie Meyer - Still has a bunch sitting in various rights of way. Hmmmm, why haven't they been picked up? Is Miss "I'm Entitled to Everything" waiting for city employees to pull them for code violations, bring them to a central location and then she (or someone) can pick them up all at once? Misuse of city personnel.
Hope the city manager doesn't let this happen
With regards to the mayoral candidates:
Mayor Michelle Signs - Signs have been removed
Dawn Tubbesing - Signs have been removed
Ajay Sood - Signs have been removed
Stephanie Meyer - Still has a bunch sitting in various rights of way. Hmmmm, why haven't they been picked up? Is Miss "I'm Entitled to Everything" waiting for city employees to pull them for code violations, bring them to a central location and then she (or someone) can pick them up all at once? Misuse of city personnel.
Hope the city manager doesn't let this happen
Sunday, August 11, 2019
Non-Discrimination Ordinance Discussion
The Council Committee will discuss the possibility of a Non-Discrimination Ordinance (sometimes referred to as Sexual Orientation Sexual Identity) at it next meeting Tuesday August 13, 2019 at 7:00PM. The meeting is held in the council chambers at city hall at 11110 Johnson Drive, Shawnee Kansas 66203 Map info here
City staff will be presenting various options for the committee to review. To read exactly what is being presented please click here
There is quite a bit of conversation going on not only here in Johnson County but all across the country. Some cities have enacted NDOs, others have opted not to saying it is the responsibility of state and federal governments. Some of the enacted ordinances have been challenged in the courts and are still going through the process, quite possibly all the way to SCOTUS.
This is one of those topics that regardless of the outcome there will be folks who ask how did this happen (or not happen). Simple, folks did not attend the various meetings of the various governing bodies.
My personal opinion: This is something that is covered by current state and federal statutes. And if those statutes do need tweaking, it is the responsibility of the state and federal governments to do the tweaking. We do not need a mishmash checkerboard layout of differing city laws. Also, enough cases are in the court systems that it becomes, IMHO a situation where the final outcome of those cases becomes known before Shawnee proceeds any further.
City staff will be presenting various options for the committee to review. To read exactly what is being presented please click here
There is quite a bit of conversation going on not only here in Johnson County but all across the country. Some cities have enacted NDOs, others have opted not to saying it is the responsibility of state and federal governments. Some of the enacted ordinances have been challenged in the courts and are still going through the process, quite possibly all the way to SCOTUS.
This is one of those topics that regardless of the outcome there will be folks who ask how did this happen (or not happen). Simple, folks did not attend the various meetings of the various governing bodies.
My personal opinion: This is something that is covered by current state and federal statutes. And if those statutes do need tweaking, it is the responsibility of the state and federal governments to do the tweaking. We do not need a mishmash checkerboard layout of differing city laws. Also, enough cases are in the court systems that it becomes, IMHO a situation where the final outcome of those cases becomes known before Shawnee proceeds any further.
Wednesday, August 07, 2019
Primary Election Unofficial Results - 8/6/19
For those that haven't heard, here are the results for the Shawnee primary election yesterday. Commentary to follow in the next day or two.
Mayor:
Michelle Distler – 3,847 or 57.22%
Stephanie Meyer – 1,736 or 25.82%
Dawn Tubbesing – 1,010 or 15.02%
Ajay Sood – 130 or 1.93%
One overvote and 71 undervotes for a total vote of 6,795.
Ward 3:
Kurt Knappen – 911 or 47.37%
Dawn Rattan – 690 or 35.88%
Nick Reed – 322 or 16.74%
39 undervotes for a total vote of 1,962
Ward 3 – Special Election:
Kevin Straub – 879 or 46.36%
Lisa Larson-Bunnell – 825 or 43.51%
Greg Sitzmann – 192 or 10.13%
66 undervotes for a total vote of 1,962
Ward 4:
Jill Chalfie – 848 or 50.45%
Kris Durbin – 527 or 31.35%
Matt Shaw – 306 or 18.20%
59 undervotes for a total vote of 1,740
The top two in each race will now go on to the general election November 5, 2019
Mayor:
Michelle Distler – 3,847 or 57.22%
Stephanie Meyer – 1,736 or 25.82%
Dawn Tubbesing – 1,010 or 15.02%
Ajay Sood – 130 or 1.93%
One overvote and 71 undervotes for a total vote of 6,795.
Ward 3:
Kurt Knappen – 911 or 47.37%
Dawn Rattan – 690 or 35.88%
Nick Reed – 322 or 16.74%
39 undervotes for a total vote of 1,962
Ward 3 – Special Election:
Kevin Straub – 879 or 46.36%
Lisa Larson-Bunnell – 825 or 43.51%
Greg Sitzmann – 192 or 10.13%
66 undervotes for a total vote of 1,962
Ward 4:
Jill Chalfie – 848 or 50.45%
Kris Durbin – 527 or 31.35%
Matt Shaw – 306 or 18.20%
59 undervotes for a total vote of 1,740
The top two in each race will now go on to the general election November 5, 2019
Sunday, August 04, 2019
Stephanie Meyer-Talking Out of Both Sides of Her Mouth-Again
Stephanie Meyer, candidate for mayor in Shawnee is again talking out of both sides of her mouth. She's a cute piece of work, that definitely does not deserve to be mayor of Shawnee.
Don't believe me? Try these statements concerning the consideration of an NDO (non-discrimination ordinance) for Shawnee. OK, I will not comment at this point on the pros or cons of such a thing. Just want to point out how Meyer plays both sides.
From the questionnaire she answered for the Citizens for a Better Shawnee:
Q4 Are there areas you feel the city government should not be involved with?
I believe that government should play as limited a role as possible in our residents' lives, while providing for their safety, welfare, and the overall stability of our community. Regarding city government, this includes many social issues that are most appropriately dealt with at the state or federal levels.
From a recent article in the Shawnee Mission Post:
As policy makers, it is our job to be sure that our actions and decisions follow legal precedent, statute, and authority. Often times, in local government, that means waiting on clarification from a higher jurisdiction. What cannot be lost in that process, however, is the more important question of "Is this the right thing to do?"
Many months in the making, I’m happy to announce that at our August 13 Council Committee meeting, we will take up the discussion of a non-discrimination ordinance. We cannot continue to wait for others to act.
I have a question for her: Don/t your jaws hurt when you talk out of both sides of your mouth?
Don't believe me? Try these statements concerning the consideration of an NDO (non-discrimination ordinance) for Shawnee. OK, I will not comment at this point on the pros or cons of such a thing. Just want to point out how Meyer plays both sides.
From the questionnaire she answered for the Citizens for a Better Shawnee:
Q4 Are there areas you feel the city government should not be involved with?
I believe that government should play as limited a role as possible in our residents' lives, while providing for their safety, welfare, and the overall stability of our community. Regarding city government, this includes many social issues that are most appropriately dealt with at the state or federal levels.
From a recent article in the Shawnee Mission Post:
As policy makers, it is our job to be sure that our actions and decisions follow legal precedent, statute, and authority. Often times, in local government, that means waiting on clarification from a higher jurisdiction. What cannot be lost in that process, however, is the more important question of "Is this the right thing to do?"
Many months in the making, I’m happy to announce that at our August 13 Council Committee meeting, we will take up the discussion of a non-discrimination ordinance. We cannot continue to wait for others to act.
I have a question for her: Don/t your jaws hurt when you talk out of both sides of your mouth?
Friday, August 02, 2019
Citizens For A Better Shawnee
The former "Vote NO" committee has transitioned to the "Citizens For A Better Shawnee".
They are on the web at https://www.citizensforabettershawnee.org/
Who are they? From their web site on the about page:
They are on the web at https://www.citizensforabettershawnee.org/
Who are they? From their web site on the about page:
"Citizens for a Better Shawnee is a non-partisan, citizen-run committee founded by the members of the "Vote No - There's a Better Way" Committee that opposed the 2019 Mail Ballot question that would have raised the property tax rate to fund a proposed community center in Shawnee.
Our efforts were successful, as the measure failed by a decisive margin, with 72% voting against it in a high-turnout election.
Members of that committee, in response to many requests to remain engaged in city government, including city elections, decided to form "Citizens for a Better Shawnee" with the purpose of focusing on fiscal responsibility, common-sense policy, and good government in Shawnee, Kansas."
Our efforts were successful, as the measure failed by a decisive margin, with 72% voting against it in a high-turnout election.
Members of that committee, in response to many requests to remain engaged in city government, including city elections, decided to form "Citizens for a Better Shawnee" with the purpose of focusing on fiscal responsibility, common-sense policy, and good government in Shawnee, Kansas."
If you click on their endorsements tab you will see their endorsements for the upcoming primary election and info on the questionnaires they sent out to the candidates. Interesting to note is which candidates failed to return the questionnaire.
Thursday, August 01, 2019
Primary Election - Tuesday 8/6/19 - My Choices
OK.............this is going to be a short post.
These are my choices for the four Shawnee primary election contests next Tuesday, 8/6/19
Mayor: Michelle Distler
Council Ward 3 Full Term: Kurt Knappen
Council Ward 3 Unexpired Term: Kevin Straub
Council Ward 4: Kris Durbin
These are my choices for the four Shawnee primary election contests next Tuesday, 8/6/19
Mayor: Michelle Distler
Council Ward 3 Full Term: Kurt Knappen
Council Ward 3 Unexpired Term: Kevin Straub
Council Ward 4: Kris Durbin
Wednesday, July 24, 2019
Why Does Stephanie Meyer Lie About Menard's?
Unbeknownst to me that it would happen, another member of the community addressed the council this past Monday regarding Stephanie Meyer's misrepresentation of why Menard's did not build in Shawnee. Instead Menard's went to KCK.
I was already looking into this because at the recent mayoral candidate's forum Stephanie Meyer stated that Menard's didn't build here because a city engineer couldn't go out to the site when they wanted him. Sounds to me like a slap in the face to staff. Ironically she jumps on anybody who says anything that could be construed as a negative about staff. Do I see a little two faced action on her part?
Anyway, at one of the "Third Thursdays With the Mayor" former City Manager Gonzales had stated when asked that Menard's was not building in Shawnee because utilities were not available at the location.
An inquiry to the current city manager did produce the following:
I am in a little bit of a difficult spot to speculate on the conversation between Carol and Menard's representatives as well as a conversation Stephanie may have had with Menard's representatives. However, the information that was shared at Third Thursday's is what I am aware of in regards to the Kansas City, Kansas location being more "shovel-ready" in regards to a quicker project. I believe sewer access was a concern-
So, KCK had land that was more shovel ready. Hmmmm, yet it is my understanding that Meyer still is telling folks the "engineer" story. Stephanie Meyer, a natural born liar, IMHO.
Stay tuned for more on her phoniness.
Side bar question: City Managers are not supposed to get involved in the political process. But, why hasn't the current city manager defended his staff against Ms. Meyer's comment.
I was already looking into this because at the recent mayoral candidate's forum Stephanie Meyer stated that Menard's didn't build here because a city engineer couldn't go out to the site when they wanted him. Sounds to me like a slap in the face to staff. Ironically she jumps on anybody who says anything that could be construed as a negative about staff. Do I see a little two faced action on her part?
Anyway, at one of the "Third Thursdays With the Mayor" former City Manager Gonzales had stated when asked that Menard's was not building in Shawnee because utilities were not available at the location.
An inquiry to the current city manager did produce the following:
I am in a little bit of a difficult spot to speculate on the conversation between Carol and Menard's representatives as well as a conversation Stephanie may have had with Menard's representatives. However, the information that was shared at Third Thursday's is what I am aware of in regards to the Kansas City, Kansas location being more "shovel-ready" in regards to a quicker project. I believe sewer access was a concern-
So, KCK had land that was more shovel ready. Hmmmm, yet it is my understanding that Meyer still is telling folks the "engineer" story. Stephanie Meyer, a natural born liar, IMHO.
Stay tuned for more on her phoniness.
Side bar question: City Managers are not supposed to get involved in the political process. But, why hasn't the current city manager defended his staff against Ms. Meyer's comment.
Monday, July 22, 2019
The Irrelevant Arrogant One
I have received various text messages from individuals on the west side of town.
Apparently his royal arrogance (Jeff Vaught) is causing quite a stir on
Next Door. He even went so far as to single out other folks' association
with me. Gotta love it.
OK, I can’t post on the west side Next Door but I can supply info below for anyone who chooses to use it
Let’s look at his royal arrogance (Jeff Vaught). The first thing we
will mention is that he is NOT a fan of transparency in government. That
can be verified from when the council, with his prodding changed the method of
delivering council minutes from full to summary. Only problem with that
is that the former city manager chose to ignore the written directive of the
council and gave the city action minutes. Those are even more
abbreviated. Long story short, the council voted to bring back full
minutes, with no help from Mr. I Know Everything.
He constantly belittled other council members and members of the public. One of his favorite comments is “I don’t remember seeing you at any council meetings”. That is how he attempts to shut down critics. What a jacka$$ Very few folks go to these meetings (personally I wish more did). But, they can listen to the audio and read the minutes
What was the final result of the mayoral primary/
Michelle Distler 28.08%
Dan Pflumm
30.40%John Segale 18.32%
Jeff Vaught 23.19%
More telling is how did the mayoral primary vote go in Ward 3? The ward he represented on the council.
Michelle Distler 26.29%
Dan Pflumm 24.80%
John Segale 16.65%
Jeff Vaught 32.26%
Translation……….67.74% (2/3) of the Ward 3 voters said they wanted anybody but Jeff Vaught as their mayor. Apparently they learned their lesson from having him represent them on the council.
But, Vaught still thought he was relevant. Not realizing that after winning his first term and then one reelection to the council , that the voters in Ward 3 were getting tired of his bombastic bullying buffoonery which combined to create a highly arrogant atmosphere about him. And it created a toxic atmosphere on the council.
So, in 2017 there was a three way primary for council in
Ward 3.
What happened?
Justin Adrian 38.94%
Dave Myres 39.82%Jeff Vaught 21.24%
So now the voters of Ward 3 (78.76%, roughly 8 out of 10) made it real clear that they did not want an arrogant buffoon to represent them on the council.
And yet, he still thinks that what he says about city
elections has relevancy. It does not. Witness his strong comments
of being in favor of the proposed Shawnee Community Center. His
bullying approach and inability to read the electorate was almost
laughable. And, like Hillary Clinton, he apparently cannot accept
defeat. He has come up with more excuses as to why the measure was
defeated. Instead of looking to see what was wrong with the plan he’d
rather blame the folks who put out the effort to get the truth about the project
in front of the voters. Such arrogance.
Again, he hasn’t learned that his commentary is irrelevant. Or maybe it is reverse relevant? Maybe it makes folks go the opposite way of his stand on an item? Hmmmm, remember, he supports Stephanie Meyer for mayor and Nick Reed for Ward 3 council rep.
Thursday, July 18, 2019
Has Stephanie Meyer Gone Totally Bonkers?
IMHO, the answer to that question is yes. Big time. The current council president and mayoral candidate posted this on her FB page at https://www.facebook.com/stephaniemeyerforshawnee/
This is what she posted:
As policy makers, it is our job to be sure that our actions and decisions follow legal precedent, statute, and authority. Often times, in local government, that means waiting on clarification from a higher jurisdiction. What cannot be lost in that process, however, is the more important question of “Is this the right thing to do?”
Many months in the making, I’m happy to announce that at our August 13 Council Committee meeting, we will take up the discussion of a non-discrimination ordinance. We cannot continue to wait for others to act.
In my experience, the residents of Shawnee are warm, welcoming, and compassionate people, and we should want that spirit to echo through all that we do. I hope you’ll participate in this important conversation.
This push for cities in Kansas to adopt non-discriminatory ordinances is absolutely ridiculous. How many of them are still being challenged in the courts?
Laws against discrimination belong at the state and/or federal level. For various reasons. A hodgepodge of these ordinances means that folks traveling from city to city would need a book of ordinances for all cities. But, even more important are cities really the best entities to judge and evaluate what some may or may not perceive as discrimination? Do cities have the resources? Do cities have the funding?
This is a "feel good" act looking for a problem.
Now, let's take a look at state law. K.S.A 44-1009 has a pretty good handle on this subject, and if it needs amending, expanding or anything along those lines then encourage the state legislature to make those changes. Keep it uniform across the whole State of Kansas. Keep it uniform so that violations of the statute can be handled in a judicious manner. Not in a helter skelter willy nilly fashion. Keep in mind that this item is being championed by the same cheerleader who wanted to saddle Shawnee residents with an enormous tax burden to finance a community center.
The council committee will be discussing this item at its meeting on Tuesday Aug 13, 2019 at 7PM at Shawnee City Hall, 11110 Johnson Drive. Let her and any other members of the council that support this know that this is an item best left to the State of Kansas.
This is what she posted:
As policy makers, it is our job to be sure that our actions and decisions follow legal precedent, statute, and authority. Often times, in local government, that means waiting on clarification from a higher jurisdiction. What cannot be lost in that process, however, is the more important question of “Is this the right thing to do?”
Many months in the making, I’m happy to announce that at our August 13 Council Committee meeting, we will take up the discussion of a non-discrimination ordinance. We cannot continue to wait for others to act.
In my experience, the residents of Shawnee are warm, welcoming, and compassionate people, and we should want that spirit to echo through all that we do. I hope you’ll participate in this important conversation.
This push for cities in Kansas to adopt non-discriminatory ordinances is absolutely ridiculous. How many of them are still being challenged in the courts?
Laws against discrimination belong at the state and/or federal level. For various reasons. A hodgepodge of these ordinances means that folks traveling from city to city would need a book of ordinances for all cities. But, even more important are cities really the best entities to judge and evaluate what some may or may not perceive as discrimination? Do cities have the resources? Do cities have the funding?
This is a "feel good" act looking for a problem.
Now, let's take a look at state law. K.S.A 44-1009 has a pretty good handle on this subject, and if it needs amending, expanding or anything along those lines then encourage the state legislature to make those changes. Keep it uniform across the whole State of Kansas. Keep it uniform so that violations of the statute can be handled in a judicious manner. Not in a helter skelter willy nilly fashion. Keep in mind that this item is being championed by the same cheerleader who wanted to saddle Shawnee residents with an enormous tax burden to finance a community center.
The council committee will be discussing this item at its meeting on Tuesday Aug 13, 2019 at 7PM at Shawnee City Hall, 11110 Johnson Drive. Let her and any other members of the council that support this know that this is an item best left to the State of Kansas.
Friday, July 12, 2019
Stephanie Meyer and the Gang of Six Have No Confidence in Shawnee Citizens
Wow, that is a heck of a headline, isn't it?
So, are you asking why I say that? Actually, it is pretty easy to explain. First let's define the "Gang of Six". That includes Meyer, and Councilmembers Zimmerman, Neighbor, Larson-Bunnell, Sandifer and Constance.
Now for what happened. It is a matter of record. At the last Council Committee meeting members Jenkins and Kemmling brought forth some proposals regarding the budget process. One of these was to establish a citizen task force to review the budgets going forward and if needed recommend adjustments by looking for ways to possibly reduce or move allocations. The task force would consist of 2 members appointed by each councilmember and two from the council itself.
The "Gang of Six" did everything they could to shoot down that idea, and unfortunately they succeeded. Among the reasons given were the high quality of our staff and the fact that we use priority based budgeting.
We probably do have a very high quality staff. But, they are human. And sometimes humans can make mistakes, errors, or not see certain things etc. etc. etc. They are not perfect. A task force as proposed by Jenkins and Kemmling would utilize the other advantage we have here in Shawnee. To wit, a very diverse, intelligent community with folks from all career backgrounds. The task force would not be decision making but advising. Folks outside of the budget process might just see some things that could prove to be beneficial. So, what is the gang of six afraid of?
We have boards and commissions made up of citizens already. And some of them are in a position where they virtually do make the decision (Board of Zoning Appeals, Planning Commission).
So again, why would the "Gang of Six" be against utilizing the wealth of experience and knowledge that our residents could bring to the table? I have my opinions, you can formulate your own
So, are you asking why I say that? Actually, it is pretty easy to explain. First let's define the "Gang of Six". That includes Meyer, and Councilmembers Zimmerman, Neighbor, Larson-Bunnell, Sandifer and Constance.
Now for what happened. It is a matter of record. At the last Council Committee meeting members Jenkins and Kemmling brought forth some proposals regarding the budget process. One of these was to establish a citizen task force to review the budgets going forward and if needed recommend adjustments by looking for ways to possibly reduce or move allocations. The task force would consist of 2 members appointed by each councilmember and two from the council itself.
The "Gang of Six" did everything they could to shoot down that idea, and unfortunately they succeeded. Among the reasons given were the high quality of our staff and the fact that we use priority based budgeting.
We probably do have a very high quality staff. But, they are human. And sometimes humans can make mistakes, errors, or not see certain things etc. etc. etc. They are not perfect. A task force as proposed by Jenkins and Kemmling would utilize the other advantage we have here in Shawnee. To wit, a very diverse, intelligent community with folks from all career backgrounds. The task force would not be decision making but advising. Folks outside of the budget process might just see some things that could prove to be beneficial. So, what is the gang of six afraid of?
We have boards and commissions made up of citizens already. And some of them are in a position where they virtually do make the decision (Board of Zoning Appeals, Planning Commission).
So again, why would the "Gang of Six" be against utilizing the wealth of experience and knowledge that our residents could bring to the table? I have my opinions, you can formulate your own
Thursday, July 04, 2019
Happy Birthday USA
Happy birthday to the USA.
A special note to those who are objecting to President Trump's inclusion of the military in a special July 4th celebration, get over it! It was the military that secured our independence, and it has been the military that has insured that independence, and it is the military that will continue to make sure that we remain a free and independent nation by protecting all of us from aggressive enemies.
To include a military display in the 4th of July celebration is right, justified, and fitting. God bless the USA.
A special note to those who are objecting to President Trump's inclusion of the military in a special July 4th celebration, get over it! It was the military that secured our independence, and it has been the military that has insured that independence, and it is the military that will continue to make sure that we remain a free and independent nation by protecting all of us from aggressive enemies.
To include a military display in the 4th of July celebration is right, justified, and fitting. God bless the USA.
Wednesday, June 26, 2019
Kevin Straub - Ward III Special Election
Kevin Straub has tossed his hat into the ring for the Ward III special election (primary) to fill the unexpired 2 years of the term by former council member Justin Adrian.
Kevin will be facing Lisa Larson-Bunnell who was appointed to temporarily fill the position until this election and Greg Sitzman. The top two vote getters in this election on August 6th will move on to the general election November 5th.
You might want to visit Kevin's web site at Kevin Straub for Shawnee City Council | Ward 3 Special Election
Kevin will help to get the city council set on going down the right road for Shawnee's future. Vote for Kevin.
Kevin will be facing Lisa Larson-Bunnell who was appointed to temporarily fill the position until this election and Greg Sitzman. The top two vote getters in this election on August 6th will move on to the general election November 5th.
You might want to visit Kevin's web site at Kevin Straub for Shawnee City Council | Ward 3 Special Election
Kevin will help to get the city council set on going down the right road for Shawnee's future. Vote for Kevin.
Friday, June 14, 2019
Jenkins/Kemmling Proposal for Storm Water Pipes
The condition of Shawnee's storm water pipes has been a subject of discussion since the recent presentation that pipe failures could cost as much as $140 million over the next 10 years.
Councilmembers Eric Jenkins and Mike Kemmling have prepared a proposal and resolution to address this item. It can be read at https://cityofshawnee.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/24449?preview=24451
This item is going to be discussed at the Council Committee meeting on Tuesday June 18, 2019 at city hall beginning at 7:00PM
The proposal makes sense. Citizens are encouraged to attend the meeting and to support this important concept.
Councilmembers Eric Jenkins and Mike Kemmling have prepared a proposal and resolution to address this item. It can be read at https://cityofshawnee.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/24449?preview=24451
This item is going to be discussed at the Council Committee meeting on Tuesday June 18, 2019 at city hall beginning at 7:00PM
The proposal makes sense. Citizens are encouraged to attend the meeting and to support this important concept.
Wednesday, June 12, 2019
Stephanie Meyer - Talks From Both Sides of Her Mouth
Well it looks like I missed some fun and games at city hall Monday night. Not gonna get into much of what was said. I do want to discuss procedures.
Seems like some citizens had a few things
to say and then Councilmember Mickey Sandifer decided to wait until
"Miscellaneous Council Items" to get real down and dirty with a
member of the public. Based on eyewitness accounts and audio files this
is basically what happened next.
A citizen got up to rebut what he was
saying. Stephanie Meyer and Mickey Sandifer shouted out you can't do that
it is not allowed. City manager Nolan Sunderman whispered into the
mayor's ear with what was probably an interpretation of the council procedures
and the mayor said that the citizen couldn't say anything. It was not
allowed. Former Councilmember Jeff Vaught yelled out to that citizen to
sit down and that it was not allowed for them to speak during that part of the
meeting.
Well, that was bad information. On
Oct 26, 2015 Policy Statement 7 was modified in Section IV(D)(2) to give
citizens the right to speak during miscellaneous council items. And if
anybody is interested the Shawnee Dispatch had a nice article about that change
and it is still available on line at http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2015/oct/29/council-approves-additional-public-comment-meeting/
What is really interesting is Stephanie Meyer's quote in the above referenced article. "Anytime
we can increase public participation at meetings, I'm for it." Looks
like she became a little two faced on that subject. Guess citizen
participation is only good if she feels the same as they do. And this individual, who apparently now wants to restrict citizen input after saying how great
it was, wants to be mayor of our city. Which side of her mouth will she
be talking from tomorrow? She'll say just about anything to get
elected.
Now as for Vaught.....what gives him the right to
tell another citizen to sit down? What gives him the right to say it is
not allowed for them to speak at that time? Go back to various on line
articles and previous meetings before Oct 26, 2015. Jeff The Bully Vaught
was the major impetus for getting that part of the policy statement
changed. He had a nasty habit of using Miscellaneous Council items to say
some negative things about citizens and they couldn't, until the change, rebut
what he said.
As
for the City Manager, Nolan Sunderman, if he did in fact advise the mayor that citizen input was
not allowed at that time he was way off base.
Sunday, June 09, 2019
We Steal a Good One From Lenexa
I think it has finally happened. Last week Hayward's Pit BBQ relocated to 10901 W. 75th St in Shawnee (two blocks east of Nieman). That is the building that has seen a revolving door effect with restaurants.
Well, it looks like we finally have a winner in that building. Went there Friday night. Wait time was about 45 minutes. They were jammed. Parking lot was full. Fantastic. Friend of mine told me that parking lot was also jammed at lunch.
Enjoyed dinner. Food was good. Wait staff was friendly, upbeat and checked back which, considering how crowded they were could have taken a hit. Kudos to the wait staff. Kudos to the kitchen staff.
Even with all the previous owners it had been a long time since the interior was remodeled. It finally happened now.
Looks like we finally have a keeper at that location.
Well, it looks like we finally have a winner in that building. Went there Friday night. Wait time was about 45 minutes. They were jammed. Parking lot was full. Fantastic. Friend of mine told me that parking lot was also jammed at lunch.
Enjoyed dinner. Food was good. Wait staff was friendly, upbeat and checked back which, considering how crowded they were could have taken a hit. Kudos to the wait staff. Kudos to the kitchen staff.
Even with all the previous owners it had been a long time since the interior was remodeled. It finally happened now.
Looks like we finally have a keeper at that location.
Wednesday, June 05, 2019
The Longest Day
In 1962 the film "The Longest Day" was released. It was a portrayal of the Normandy landings on D-Day, June 6, 1944.
Tomorrow is the 75th anniversary of that momentous occasion. Below is the theme song from that movie with lyrics. Listen to the lyrics, please. And if you get a chance, watch the movie.
Tomorrow is the 75th anniversary of that momentous occasion. Below is the theme song from that movie with lyrics. Listen to the lyrics, please. And if you get a chance, watch the movie.
Monday, June 03, 2019
Who Is Running?
Today was the last day to file and/or withdraw from the local city elections.
So, what is happening now:
Primary Election: August 6, 2019. The top two finishers in each contest will advance to the General Election November 5, 2019
Mayor
Michelle Distler (Incumbent)
Dawn Tubbesing
Ajay Sood
Stephanie Meyer
Council Member Ward 3 Full Term Four Years
Kurt Knappen
Nick Reed
Dawn Rattan
Council Member Ward 3 Unexpired Two Year Term
Kevin Straub
Lisa Larson-Bunnell (Incumbent)
Greg Sitzmann
Council Member Ward 4 Full Term Four Years
Kris Durbin
Matthew Shaw
Jill Chalfie
General Election: November 5, 2019 These individuals will run in November as they do not have any primary challengers in August
Council Member Ward 1 Full Term Four Years
Tammy Thomas
Jim Neighbor (Incumbent)
Council Member Ward 2 Full Term Four Years
Eric Jenkins (Incumbent)
Andy Rondon
So, what is happening now:
Primary Election: August 6, 2019. The top two finishers in each contest will advance to the General Election November 5, 2019
Mayor
Michelle Distler (Incumbent)
Dawn Tubbesing
Ajay Sood
Stephanie Meyer
Council Member Ward 3 Full Term Four Years
Kurt Knappen
Nick Reed
Dawn Rattan
Council Member Ward 3 Unexpired Two Year Term
Kevin Straub
Lisa Larson-Bunnell (Incumbent)
Greg Sitzmann
Council Member Ward 4 Full Term Four Years
Kris Durbin
Matthew Shaw
Jill Chalfie
General Election: November 5, 2019 These individuals will run in November as they do not have any primary challengers in August
Council Member Ward 1 Full Term Four Years
Tammy Thomas
Jim Neighbor (Incumbent)
Council Member Ward 2 Full Term Four Years
Eric Jenkins (Incumbent)
Andy Rondon
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)