Interesting item in the Washington Post click here.
Seems like our Divider in Chief and his Attorney General lackey are very selective in who they go after.
From the article linked to above:
It is against the law to protest and intimidate federal judges, witnesses, jurors. Federal law — Section 1507 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code — clearly states that it is unlawful to protest near a “residence occupied or used by [a] judge, juror, witness, or court officer” with the intent of influencing “the discharge of his duty,” adding that anyone who “uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
The reason is simple: It is obstruction of justice. Just as it is against the law to tamper with witnesses or jurors by intimidating them or their family, it’s unlawful to tamper with a Supreme Court justice by coming to their home to threaten, harass or coerce them to influence their vote in a case before the court. And these demonstrators get egged on by Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. Those two need to be charged with inciting riots. But of course not, just go after Donald Trump.
But, Attorney General Garland had no problems with directing the FBI to investigate parents who spoke at school board meetings (which is not a violation of federal law). They weren't even protesting. They were speaking on topics during their allotted time to do so.
Will our Member of Congress, Sharice Davids, speak out against those individuals who are violating federal law? Probably not, because she is of the same mind set as Biden, Schumer, Pelosi and probably the infamous "squad". Toss her sorry rear end out of congress in November.
