Wednesday, December 18, 2013

State Rep John Rubin's Bills for More Transparency in State Government

Our Shawnee Representative in the Kansas House, John Rubin, has long been an ardent advocate of full governmental transparency and accountability.  He believes that responsible governance demands that elected officials always strive to fully inform themselves on the issues and all aspects of legislation on which they vote, to cast informed votes, and always to disclose to their constituents how they voted on the public policies that affect the lives of Kansans.

For these reasons, Rep. Rubin is now fighting to change longstanding Kansas legislative practices of bundling multiple bills in a single conference committee report for one vote under the Joint Rules, and of not recording votes on bills, resolutions and amendments in the Committee of the Whole on General Orders under the House Rules, practices he believes are undemocratic.   He has drafted resolutions amending the Kansas Legislature's Joint Rules and House Rules to correct these undemocratic legislative practices, and plans to prefile them the week before the 2014 legislative session starts.  

The first is a Concurrent Resolution amending the Joint Rules to provide that a conference committee report may contain only the bill being conferenced and all or part of one other bill that has passed either Chamber during the current term.  Existing practice allows for an unlimited number of additional bills or parts of bills  to be added to a conference committee report (CCR).   Often, legislators have little if any opportunity to fully inform himself or herself of the contents, consequences or effects of the many additional bills in a CCR, particularly if the added bills did not originate in and were not debated in their Chamber, and particularly under the pressing time constraints experienced late in session, when most of these CCRs are considered.  Accordingly, the likelihood that most members are even marginally well informed on the votes they are asked to cast on these multi-bundled CCRs is slim.  Worse, it is highly likely than in any CCR with six, eight or more such bills, a member may fully support some of the bundled bills because they square with the member’s principles and are, in his or her view, good public policy, and may oppose others because they are not.  In short, current practice virtually ensures that members often cast uninformed and unprincipled votes on much of the public policy contained in multi-bundled CCRs.  Rep. Rubin believes that is no way to govern.  His Concurrent Resolution will correct these irresponsible and undemocratic  practices.

The second Rubin proposal is a House Resolution amending the House Rules to require that all House floor votes, whether in the Committee of the Whole on General Orders or on Final Action, shall be recorded votes.  Current practice on General Orders in the Kansas House is that all votes on bills, resolutions and amendments are voice votes, or, on a division call,  unrecorded electronic votes, absent a show of 15 hands requiring a recorded vote.  Make no mistake – those “unrecorded” electronic division votes are in fact being recorded outside the chamber and in the House Gallery, by handwritten notes, camera phones directed to the closed circuit television screen, and otherwise,  by government officials, lobbyists, and other political insiders vested in the outcomes of these votes.  Rep. Rubin believes that citizens should have the same access to these vote results that political insiders do.  Moreover, all Kansans are, in  his view, entitled to know how legislators vote on every public policy question put to them – in bills, amendments and resolutions – not just on Final Action, but preliminarily on General Orders as well.  In his view, legislators' oath of office and their responsibility to be transparent in their votes and accountable to the people of Kansas for them require no less.


I applaud Rep. Rubin for his noteworthy efforts to enhance public transparency and accountability in the Kansas Legislature. 

Let John know that you support his efforts, of if you'd like more info:  Email:john.rubin@house.ks.gov

If your Shawnee State rep is Charles Macheers, Email:charles.macheers@house.ks.gov Brett Hildabrand, Email:hildabrand2010@gmail.com or Kelly Meigs, Email:krmeigs@live.com email them and ask them to support John's bills:




Tuesday, December 17, 2013

New Kid on the Block

Well it's been almost two months since Stephanie Meyer was appointed to the city council for Ward III.

How has she been doing?  Well, it all depends on what items are of interest or importance to a person.

On three recent items I would have to say that Ms. Meyer definitely was "for the people", which I think is good.

1.  At the council committee meeting regarding changes in PS-7 and public input at committee meetings, she spoke in favor of citizen input and that is how it finalized.  Note:  Her ward mate, Jeff Vaught expressed a position that would have reduced public input.

2.  At the council committee meeting regarding the ballot for the proposed sales tax retentions and increases, Ms. Meyer spoke in favor of letting it go to the November general election.  That would be a no cost election for the city.  On the other hand, her ward mate Jeff Vaught spoke in favor of making it a mail in ballot in the spring which would cost the city $100,000.  Yepper, 100 big ones.

3.  At the city council meeting that saw the appointment of Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage) to the planning commission, Ms. Meyer voted against it, wanting to see more representation from the west side.  Her ward mate, Jeff Vaught voted for Uncle Alan, which kept the planning commission unbalanced as to equitable representation by areas of the city.

So, on these three issues how would I rate her?  Three actions "for the people".  Good job.

Her ward mate, Jeff "The Arrogant One" Vaught on these three actions was definitely "against the people".  Puke time.


WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.

Monday, December 16, 2013

Shawnee Public Works Dept Receives Award

This info from the city's web site:

"The City of Shawnee’s Public Works Department - Field Operations Division received the 2013 American Public Works Association (APWA) Kansas City Metro Chapter Operations Program Award for its Snow Removal Program at the Annual Holiday Meeting and Award Ceremony."

Great job folks.  For the rest of the story please go herehttp://www.cityofshawnee.org/WEB/ShawneeCMS.nsf/vwNews/F418C1BC9A8CD6D786257C3F006D757C?OpenDocument


Sunday, December 15, 2013

Jim Neighbor Claims Planning Commission is Unstable

At the recent city council meeting that saw the appointment of Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage) Councilmember Jim Neighbor, Ward I said that we had a young planning commission and that Willoughby would bring stability.  Needless to say, Neighbor was one of four who supported the nepotistic appointment of Willoughby.

Young?  Chronologically young?  Time of service young?  Is Mr. Neighbor saying that the planning commission is unstable?  Apparently so, if the appointment of Uncle Alan would bring stability to it.

So, let's look at the time of service dates of the members, not counting Willoughby:

Bogina        12/2002
Bienhoff       2/2005
Busby           8/2007
Schnefke      9/2009
Hageman      7/2011
Kenig            2/2012
Fiser             6/2012
Navarro        8/2012
Wiseman      8/2012
Sheahan       8/2013

Willoughby's 1st term on the commission was from 4/2010 - 7/2012.  Actual previous time would give him just two more months service than Commissioner Hageman.

What's wrong with that make up?  What kind of stability can Willoughby bring?  Was Neighbor referring to their actual ages?  Don't know and don't have that info.

I do remember there was a time, not too long ago when Councilmember Vaught made some negative comments about some who at that time had service on the council over 20 years.

So, what is the proper balance?  And if the planning commission is/was unstable maybe the mayor needed to ask for resignations.

I think Neighbor's comments were a bunch of nonsense.  Actually I think they were something else.


WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Mayor Breaks Tie Vote to Get Uncle Alan Appointed to Planning Commission

If you followed my post from last week, (scroll down, it is the one from 12/5/13) you will see that Mayor Jeff Meyers was recommending his uncle by marriage, Alan Willoughby to the Planning Commission.

You may remember that it was Willoughby's appointment to the city council to fill an open seat that prompted a KOMA investigation by the JoCo DA.  The investigation resulted in a letter that was definitely a reprimand. 

So, what happened last night?  When the mayor put Willoughby's name out there it started an interesting discussion.  It seems that with the recent appointment of Stephanie Meyer to the City Council (which created the opening on the planning commission), that the make up of the commission became even more lopsided.  Of the remaining 10 members, only 2 live west of I-435 and only one of those resides in Ward III.  Willoughby's application was dated last Wednesday 12/4 just in time to make it on the agenda.  Ironically, a Ward III resident put their application in within days of the aforementioned council appointment.

Yours truly got up and suggested that the council table the item and look to find an individual out of Ward III to fill the position.  This would be a step towards balancing the commission and also involve folks who live in the area of the city with the most future growth potential.

You would think that the Ward III councilmembers would be in favor of that.  Well, they were split.  The newest member of the council, and from Ward III, Stephanie Meyer did voice objections to Willoughby's appointment.  And she was right.  On the other hand, Jeff "His Royal Arrogance" Vaught raised all kinds of bovine scatological arguments to support Willoughby.  Guess he really doesn't care about the folks in his own ward.

What was the final result?  Four councilmembers voted against the Willoughby appointment.  Those four were Dan Pflumm, Ward I, Mike Kemmling Ward II, Stephanie Meyer Ward III and Michelle Distler Ward IV.  These four did the right thing.

Who were the four that supported the mayor's nepotistic action?  Jim Neighbor Ward I, Neal Sawyer Ward II, Jeff Vaught Ward III and Mickey Sandifer Ward IV.

So, now we had a tie.  The mayor chose to use his tie breaking powers to appoint his uncle by marriage to the planning commission.


WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.

Sunday, December 08, 2013

Vaught Pushes to Waste $100,000 of City Funds

Wow, the headline is a strong statement.  But, it is a fact.

At last Tuesday's (12/3/13) Council Committee meeting an item came up to put the issue of continuing two sales taxes (collectively known as Parks & Pipes) and a new one for pavements, on a ballot for the citizens of Shawnee to vote on.  The merits of the taxes will not be discussed in this post.

Now that is the way it should be.  The citizens have a right to vote on these items.  Here's the problem:  City Manager Gonzales proposed a time line that would create a mail in ballot in the spring of 2014.  That would cost $100,000.  The city could put it on the ballot for the November general election at no cost.  The November election is a county wide election and cities can piggy back for zero dollars in election costs.  Various council members expressed concern about spending the $100,000 when the item could be put before the voters at no charge.

Councilmember Vaught appeared to be the primary proponent for doing it in the spring.  In his rants he even went so far as to accuse another council member of having "blinders on" because that council member had the temerity to disagree with His Royal Arrogance.  So much for civility, which Vaught has always claimed we need more of on the council, but is the first to be uncivil.  Vaught's concern stemmed from the concept that a tax question, on the bottom of a ballot during a partisan election would automatically be voted down.  Not so Mr. Know it All.  If the public is educated, regarding the pros and cons of the issues, then the citizens of Shawnee can make informed, intelligent decisions.  He even indicated that with a mail in ballot, the folks that had responded to the most recent citizen satisfaction survey (by mail) would be the ones to return them and then the items would be approved.
Looking around the metro there have been many tax items put on the ballot that have been approved, and yes, some have been turned down, but a larger turn out let's you know how the people feel.  This is something that if you listen closely to his comments, he is not in favor of............how the people feel.

Ironically, Council member Dan Pflumm challenged Vaught to the extent that Vaught was against spending $30,000 for a special election to fill the recent open Ward III seat, but now is willing to spend $100,000 instead of getting a freebie election.  Vaught's response was that there was a procedure for the council appointment set up.  He's right.  There is.  And it states that if the council does not fill the vacancy then it goes to a special election.  Naturally Vaught did not want that, even though 3 of the 4 interviewed for the position said it should.  Ironic, eh?

Anyway, back to the election for the sales taxes.  This matter will be coming back before the committee.  It is not over.  The people of Shawnee need to address this matter at a general election in November for two reasons:

1.  November elections get larger turnouts and more citizens of Shawnee could express their view, pro or con.
2.  A November ballot question would be at no charge to the city as opposed to $100,000 for a spring mail ballot.

If you don't believe me about Vaught's attitude and comments, then please listen to the audio of the meeting.  You can hear how he puts himself above all others, including the citizens of Shawnee.  The audio is available here:
http://www.cityofshawnee.org/WEB/ShawneeCMS.nsf/vwContent/Agendas?OpenDocument&navKey=Home

Go to the 12/3/13 committee meeting and click on "Listen to Audio of Meeting"
To save time you can scroll forward to approximately the 1 hr 25 min mark of the meeting to hear this subject matter, bypassing the other two items on that agenda.


WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.



DTJVSD

Thursday, December 05, 2013

Mayor to Appoint Uncle Alan to Planning Commission

I'm on the city's email list to get notifications of all meetings.  Needless to say, when the notice for this upcoming council meeting (12/9/13) came in, I clicked on the link to view the agenda with supporting documents.

I was not prepared for what was contained on the agenda.  Mayor Jeff Meyers is recommending that the council appoint Alan Willoughby (his uncle by marriage) to the planning commission.

Sound familiar?  Well, Mr. Willoughby has previously served on the planning commission and then left that position when he was appointed to fill the unexpired term of David Morris who had resigned from the city council.  Remember the brouhaha that caused?  The KOMA investigation?  And yes, the letter from the JoCo DA which was clearly a reprimand.  (Yes a reprimand, even though we have one councilmember who does not understand the meaning/definition of that word).  Then, when "Uncle Alan" ran for the council on his own, for a full term, he was defeated.

Anyway an opening on the planning commission has occurred because Stephanie Meyer has been appointed to the city council.  So now the mayor wants to appoint "Uncle Alan" to the planning commission, again.  Is this the consolation prize for losing the election for the council?  Is this designed to give him another line on his resumé should he decide to run for the council in the 2015 election?

Ironically, another individual submitted the documentation (10/31) to fill the seat on the planning commission prior to the date of "Uncle Alan's" submission (12/4).  An individual with an engineering background, who has served as a public works director and who might just provide some fresh insight into the items that come before that commission.

I remember a couple of years ago when council member Vaught had a hold put on some applications for the planning commission.  Methinks, not only a hold, but a thumbs down vote is in order for this one.

For those who don't believe this is happening please go here:

http://www.cityofshawnee.org/Meetings/AGENDAS.NSF/vwNews/01F29E81ADCB439E86257C380080D015/$FILE/City_Council_2013_12_9_Agenda_with_Supporting_Documentation.pdf

WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.

Sunday, November 24, 2013

Vaught and His Hypocrisy

Something that happened at the meeting that selected Stephanie Meyer for the Ward III council seat reminded me of some of Jeff (The Arrogant One) Vaught's hypocrisy.

Previously, Vaught had been highly critical of and publicly excoriated a state representative for getting involved in Shawnee politics.  And he did that using the dais of the council chambers for his rant.  All that, even though the state rep is a Shawnee resident and has every right to speak out on what happens in the city.  http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2012/04/after-smoke-has-cleared.html

But, when Vaught ran for reelection he had no problem touting the endorsement of US Sen Jerry Moran, a Hays, Kansas resident.

Also, Vaught's recent support of a new rental townhome project in western Shawnee (in Ward III) would appear to contradict his previous negative statements of the rights of those who rent.  Maybe we need to notify the folks who move into those units that their council member doesn't think they have a stake in Shawnee. 


WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.

Sunday, November 17, 2013

2015 City Elections

In approximately one year from now folks will be signing up to run for office in the city elections of April 2015.

That's not that far away.  Personally, I'd like to see more citizens involved with what happens on the local level to include voting in the city elections.

So, what do we have to look forward to?

Mayor:  Jeff Meters will be finishing his third term.  Add that to all the years he has served as a member of the council and he has definitely put in lots of time.  Look for him to retire from city politics.  What will happen?  See some comments below.

Ward I:  Jim Neighbor is up for reelection.  Most of the time one does not know what his position is on various issues until he votes.  It would be nice if he would state his position(s) ahead of time.

Ward II:  Long term council member Neal Sawyer is probably going to retire after this term, leaving his seat up for grabs.  It should be noted that Alan Willoughby, the mayor's uncle by marriage, has been attending most council and committee meetings.  Is he planning a run on his own? 

Ward III:  Stephanie Meyer who was just appointed to fill an open seat will now have an opportunity to run for election for a full term on her own.  Jeff "The Arrogant One" Vaught is rumored to be considering a run for mayor.  Since his seat on the council is not up for reelection at this time, his council seat is safe if he loses the mayor's race.  If he runs for mayor, let's help him to keep his seat on the council by losing the mayoral election. 

Ward IV:  Now this one is the fun one to watch.  Mickey Sandifer is up for reelection but it appears that he wants a shot at the mayor's office.  Since Mickey can only run for one office, he would have to run and win for mayor to stay in government.  Now, if he runs for mayor, that means that there is no incumbent running.  Guess what? Ward IV is getting a new resident.  None other than Dawn "Motormouth" Kuhn.  That is unless she runs under her soon to be new married name.  But, a motormouth is still a motormouth.  Kuhn getting elected to represent Ward IV would be just as much of a disaster as Jeff Vaught getting elected to be mayor.  Between Sandifer or Vaught, it's gottta be Sandifer...............unless somebody else pops in.

Stay involved Shawnee, the future of your city could depend on it.

WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Veteran's Day 2013

The City of Shawnee's salute to veterans will begin at 4PM on Monday, 11/11/13 at Veteran's Memorial Park, Johnson Drive and Pflumm Road.

More information is available here:  http://www.cityofshawnee.org/WEB/ShawneeCMS.nsf/vwContent/ShawneeSalutesOurVeterans

A History of Veteran's Day


 
 
 
As a reminder to our veterans, and any active duty personnel that may be attending.  When signing the Defense Appropriation Bills for 2008 & 2009, President George Bush enacted changes regarding the rendering of the military hand salute.
 
Veterans and active duty military in civilian clothes may choose to render the military hand salute instead of the civilian salute when the colors are raised or lowered, are passing in review, or during the playing of the National Anthem.

Monday, November 04, 2013

Citizen Input at Public Meetings & Property Maintenance Code Enforcement

Tomorrow, Tuesday 11/5/13 the Council Committee will be reviewing Policy Statement 7 (PS-7).

This is the policy statement that governs the conduct of city council and council committee meetings.  It covers many aspect of the meetings to include citizen input.

Whether you have spoken out at any of these meetings in the past, plan on doing so in the future, or are just interested in how the process works this is a meeting to attend.  One never knows when they may have an issue to speak out about.  Just ask those who live in certain subdivisions that have recently had issues concerning public green spaces.  Think about the recent statements that the city may have to raise taxes in the not too distant future for infrastructure maintenance and repairs.  One never knows when one might want/need to speak at city hall. 

The policy concerning Property Maintenance Code Enforcement (PS-55) is also going to be reviewed at this meeting.

The agenda with supporting documents is available at:
http://www.cityofshawnee.org/Meetings/AGENDAS.NSF/vwNews/F11AEDFA81E3E7AB86257C1500732096/$FILE/Council_Committee_2013_11_5_Agenda_with_Supporting_Documentation.pdf


The meeting starts at city hall at 7PM, at 11110 Johnson Drive.

WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.

Thursday, October 31, 2013

Vaught Just Doesn't Get It

At this past Monday's special council meeting to select a replacement for the open Ward III seat, councilmember Michelle Distler had an email from early August put on the overhead projector.
The email basically said that when Kuhn resigned from her Ward III seat, that Stephanie Meyer would be the individual selected to fill it.  The email went on to indicate which four sitting councilmembers would vote for Meyer:  Vaught, Sandifer, Neighbor and Sawyer.

Jeff Vaught labeled the email a rumor.

Well, let's see what happened:
1.  Kuhn resigned
2.  Stephanie Meyer was selected for the seat
3.  The councilmembers voting for Meyer were Vaught, Sandifer, Neighbor and Sawyer

Hmmmmmm........was the email a rumor?  Was it a coincidence?  Prophetic?  Psychic?  Clairvoyent?  Prescient? Or did word get out as to what the outcome would be?

When each of the candidates was asked if they thought the decision had been predetermined, their answers were interesting:

Sheahan emphasized the word "majority". He didn't  know if the "majority" had decided.
King said he didn't know for sure but maybe
Lauer said it was common knowledge the likelihood of which candidate it would be
Meyer said no

So they were all affirmative except Meyer.
 
Here's a thought.  Maybe it was predetermined. And maybe, just maybe, as a result of the KOMA investigation because of the prior appointment of Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage) that maybe certain individuals handled their collusion in a more surreptitious manner.

 
WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
 

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Who Would the Applicants Have Picked?

At Monday night's special council meeting to select an individual to fill the Ward III seat, the sitting councilmembers asked questions of the applicants.

One of the questions that Councilmember Michelle Distler asked of each of the applicants was if they were sitting on the council that night, which of the applicants would they pick.  Ironically, the responses were Jeff King and Jason Sheahan.  Nobody picked Stephanie Meyer, well, except Stephanie Meyer, and then she had to be reminded that the question was if she was already sitting on the council................interesting, eh?


WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
If you would like to comment about this post, or any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to
http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Another Scripted Council Appointment?

First, before I comment on last night's council appointment of Stephanie Meyer to fill the vacancy in Ward III, I would like to wish Owen Donohoe a speedy full recovery.

Mr. Donohoe, one of the applicants for the position was taken yesterday afternoon to an ER for a pulmonary embolism and then transferred by ambulance to another facility.

OK, let's talk about Stephanie Meyer's appointment to the council.  What a farce.  A better script could not have been written by a Tony award winning Broadway playwright.

Councilmember Michelle Distler showed an email...............from early August, prior to Dawn Kuhn's resignation.  In that email it was mentioned that Kuhn was going to resign and that Stephanie Meyer was going to get the position.  The email even stated which four council members would vote for her.

Now, Jeff Vaught tried to discredit that email.. He even invoked the name of a former Shawnee resident as a possible generator of it.  Kind of like Obama blaming Bush for everything.  Anyway, the email was very accurate in describing what the outcome would be.  Coincidental?  Prophetic?

Keeping the above in mind makes me wonder about the question that Councilmember Dan Pflumm asked of each of the applicants.  He asked if they thought that the council should choose or if it should go to a special election.  Of the four applicants, three said the people should choose.  Mrs. Meyer was the only one who said that the current process was fine.  Contrary to what some have said, it could have gone to a special election.  The council would just have to fail to make an appointment for 60 days.  This would not require a change in the charter ordinance.  Just no action to appoint on the council's part.

So was Stephanie Meyer's appointment predetermined?  Do we even have to say, again, that the Oracle of Shawnee said the same thing, 16 days before she even applied for the position.

Councilmember Mike Kemmling expressed concern, and even brought up the JoCo DA's reprimand to the city concerning the previous appointment of Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage).  At that point Councilmember Vaught had to again show that his knowledge of the definition of basic words is very limited.  Vaught said the DA's letter was not a reprimand.  Huh?
OK......here is the link to the letter......
http://www.shawneefwiw.com/files/joco_da/2013-01-30-joco-da-shawnee-koma.pdf

Based on the definition, you decide for yourself if the letter was a reprimand or not:


n.
1. a severe rebuke, esp. a formal or official one.
v.t.
2. to reprove or rebuke severely.
[1630–40; < French réprimande, Middle French reprimend < Latin reprimenda that is to be repressed, neuter pl. ger. of reprimere to repress]
syn: reprimand, upbraid, admonish, censure mean to criticize or find fault with someone for behavior deemed reprehensible. reprimand implies a formal criticism, as by an official or person in authority: The lawyer was reprimanded by the judge. upbraid suggests relatively severe criticism, but of a less formal kind: The minister upbraided the parishioners for their poor church attendance. admonish refers to a more gentle warning or expression of disapproval, often including suggestions for improvement: I admonished the children to make less noise. censure suggests harsh, vehement criticism, often from an authoritative source: The legislators voted to censure their fellow senator
 
Vaught relies on his bombastic arrogance to make it seem like he knows what he is talking about.
 
And, the mayor had already announced that public input at this meeting would not be permitted.  Either there are some very accurate crystal balls out there or the outcome was preordained.  I have my opinion.  Do you have yours?
 
 
WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
If you would like to comment about this post, or any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to
http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com


 

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Who Will Be the New Ward III Councilperson?

It's coming down to the wire.  Monday night 10/28/13, at 6:30PM the Shawnee City Council will meet in special session to review the five applicants for the open position.

Here are the five applicants (listed alphabetically):

Owen Donohoe
Jeff King
Tony Lauer
Stephanie Meyer
Jason Sheahan

Based on qualifications, these are the two individuals that I feel are the most qualified:

1.  Owen Donohoe, who has served three terms as a state representative.  Mr. Donohoe's district included Ward III and he received thousands of votes from those folks. He has had an opportunity to work on legislation with a broader scope and involving larger fiscal responsibilities than what is normally seen at the city level.  As such, coupled with his having to work with individuals with opposing view points makes him the one applicant with the most experience for the position.

2.  Jeff King is a retired US Army Lt. Col.  As an engineer officer he held various positions of responsibility involving working with large numbers of military personnel and civilians.  Many of these positions also involved working with large budgetary figures, particularly in the public works area.  His assignment at Ft. Leavenworth with the "Lessons Learned" element speaks for itself.  The position basically called for him and his team to review situations that happened and reporting as to what was learned from those activities, the good and the bad.

With all that said, one must look at a post on this blog at
http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-oracle-speaks-about-ward-three.html

In that post the Oracle of Shawnee predicted that Stephanie Meyer would get the nod.  What is ironic is that the post was approximately 16 days before she actually filed for the position.  It would be really interesting if the Oracle's prediction comes true.

Keep in mind that the last two council appointments raised some significant questions as to propriety. So much so, that the most recent one which involved the appointment of Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage) resulted in a KOMA investigation by the JoCo DA.

Also, please keep in mind that the mayor did not allow public input at that selection meeting and he is not allowing it at this one coming up.


WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
If you would like to comment about this post, or any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to
http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Vaught Doesn't Tell it All

This was a classic "Arrogant Vaught" move. 

At the last city council session Mike Kemmling (Ward II) suggested that the council not appoint a replacement for Dawn Kuhn, but to let it go to a special election.  This is an option under certain circumstances.

Jeff Vaught (Ward III) said the voters could always confirm or refute the council's appointment when the seat comes up at the next election cycle and if the appointee runs for a full term.  To back this up he cited two cases:  the first one he mentioned was when Kevin Tubbesing was appointed but then lost in the election to Michelle Distler for a full term.  The next one he mentioned was when Jim Neighbor was appointed and then won the election for a full term.

This would make some folks think that it has been 50/50.  What he failed to mention was the most recent appointment of Alan Willoughby (the mayor's uncle by marriage), who, when he ran for election was defeated by Mike Kemmling.  That means that out of the last 3 council appointments, 2 of them (67%) were "overturned" by the people when they came up for election for a full term. 

Of course Vaught did not want to bring that one up since that was the appointment that caused the JoCo DA to investigate the mayor and certain councilmembers for a KOMA (Kansas Open Meetings Act) violation.

When Vaught makes statements with incomplete info it sounds like he is practicing for a run for mayor. 

Just thinking, does the city manager's concern about bad or misinformation pertain to folks like Vaught (or even herself)?



WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
If you would like to comment about this post, or any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to
http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Mayor Meyers Ignores His Oath of Office

Next Monday, October 28th 2013, the city council will interview the five individuals who have applied to fill the council vacancy created in Ward III by the resignation of Dawn Kuhn.  This will take place at a special council meeting, starting at 6:30PM

Mayor Meyers has already stated that he will NOT permit public comment at the special council meeting.  In August, as previously posted here, this was the mayor's response to my question as to whether or not public comment would be permitted:

Ray,

There will not be public input. I believe the Council will have the best and most information with the process to make a decision for the appointment. As you know, residents may always contact their representatives to give comment about individuals who apply.

Jeff

Look at what he says.  The "best and most information with the process"  Huh?  But this is the one that gets me:  "residents may always contact their representatives to give comment".  What is missing is that if a resident contacts their rep, that information is NOT made a part of the public record (minutes) of the meeting.  What public comment does the mayor not want to see "on the record"?

Why do I say he has ignored his oath of office?  I will restate section 3 of the Bill of Rights of the Kansas Constitution, a document the mayor has taken an oath to support.

3. Right of peaceable assembly; petition. The people have the right to assemble, in a peaceable manner, to consult for their common good, to instruct their representatives, and to petition the government, or any department thereof, for the redress of grievances.

I also sent an email to the 7 council members who would be doing the interviews as to their feelings about the mayor's decision NOT to allow public comment. 

Three of our council members support public input (Pflumm, Kemmling and Distler).  One council member does not (Sawyer).  One takes both sides (Sandifer) and two lacked the intestinal fortitude and courtesy of even replying (Neighbor and Vaught).  Guess neither one of those two wanted their thoughts to be public.

More info on the above at:
http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2013/09/which-council-members-support-citizen.html
http://shawneeray.blogspot.com/2013/09/neal-sawyer-responds.html


WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
If you would like to comment about this post, or any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to
http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

A Fifth Applicant Applies for Ward III Seat

Tony Lauer, a local entrepreneur and neighborhood activist has applied for the Ward III council seat vacancy created by the resignation of Dawn Kuhn.

The city council will meet in special session at 6:30PM on Monday 10/28/13 to interview the applicants for the seat.  If a decision is made that night, then that person will be sworn in and begin their term at the regular meeting which will follow at 7:30PM

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Lawrence Journal World Sticks it to Shawnee

OK, let's identify the players:  The Lawrence Journal World owns the Shawnee Dispatch.

Ever since Rob Roberts left the Dispatch for the KC Business Journal there has been a void at the Dispatch. 

First they send us Shawn Linenberger, but require him to divide his time between Shawnee and the paper in Tonganoxie.  Then, they bring in Jason Kendall and have him spending more time in Lawrence than in Shawnee.  Now, it is my understanding that Linenberger might be back.  But, will it be full time?

This lack of coverage by the supposedly local newspaper stinks.  Example being at last night's city council meeting.  Nobody was there to cover what turned out to be two extensive discussions.  One pertained to an agenda item:  the city's capital improvement plan for 2014-2019.  The other was  a non agenda item:  whether the council should defer the choice of Kuhn's replacement rather than the council making the selection.

Now, at this point, I am NOT going to discuss the items above as to what my opinions are of them.  What I am going to say is that the Journal World has deprived the citizens of Shawnee the opportunity to read about what happened and then to make up their own minds.  This is not the first time that the local paper has been bereft of true local coverage, post-Roberts.

Here's the kicker.  The City of Shawnee has selected the Dispatch as the publication of record.  That means that all notices that are required to be published are done so in the Dispatch.  Hey, that's our money, and our citizens are not being kept informed about what is happening.

WARNING!!!!!! The City Manager of Shawnee has determined that local bloggers post items that may contain bad or misinformation. Please read these posts with care and determine for yourself whether the information is valid.
If you would like to comment about this post, or any other post on this blog, or about anything, please go to
http://www.shawneeray.proboards.com