Well, the Shawnee Dispatch has another updated article on the Scott resignation. It can be seen here: http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2010/mar/31/scott-leave-council-april-13/
There are so many holes in that article. I wonder, does the Dispatch (aka Cheerleader) just take what they are told by the city as gospel or do they ever question things? In a previous posting I mentioned Judge Judy's book, "Don't Pee On My Leg And Tell Me It's Raining". Well, she has another comment that she uses: "If it doesn't make sense, it's probably not true."
OK, here are items from the article. Rather than comment at the end, I'll toss my comments in between them. The Dispatch comments will be in blue, my thoughts will be in red
Shawnee City Council member Cheryl Scott is resigning her Ward I seat effective April 13, but the much-anticipated resignation and the timing of its announcement are causing ripples of criticism.
Scott, who has sold her Shawnee home and is moving to Arizona, submitted her letter of resignation Friday, March 19, at City Hall. During the regular Council meeting on Monday, March 22, Council member Kevin Straub asked if Scott had yet submitted a resignation and whether there had been any discussions about selecting her replacement.
At the time, Mayor Jeff Meyers reiterated his stance that he wouldn’t have knowledge of Scott’s resignation until he received a letter from her.
So, from Friday until Monday nobody told the mayor about Scott's resignation? In the council meeting room, before the council meeting, Scott never said anything to the mayor? Did they have a one on one discussion before the meeting? C'mon now. I need a towel.........I feel something wet on my leg.
Gonzales, who later said she had reviewed Scott’s resignation letter earlier that day but had not told the mayor about the letter, did not comment on Straub’s question, nor did Scott. By not answering Straub at the meeting are they guilty of lying by omission?
When Scott’s resignation was announced publicly three days after the Council meeting, Straub began raising questions anew.
He said he believes Scott and Gonzales’ silence serves as evidence the resignation was delayed because some Council members want to replace Scott with an appointment of their choice. As it now stands, Scott’s replacement won’t be selected until after the April 6 elections in which three incumbents are facing challenges. Straub’s seat also is up for election Tuesday, but he was defeated in the March 2 primary.
"Why wasn’t it announced, why did we hold off?" Straub asked of the letter of resignation. "When the mayor came out and said ‘I have no knowledge of it,’ why didn’t the city manager correct him? Why did Cheryl think that the new City Council, the ones who are elected in April, would be better to pick her replacement than the voters?" Good questions!!!
Meyers said it was up to Scott to decide when she would resign.
"Cheryl is the Council member who has to make that decision, and who’s to say that she wasn’t going to change her mind at some point?" Meyers said. Right, she might change her mind. Bought her new house in November, near her daughter. Sold her Shawnee house in December. Just might change her mind? Where's that towel?
On Thursday, Scott confirmed she was resigning in order to move to Arizona. Wow, now that's a surprise......not.
"I was elected to do what I felt was right, and to me, this was the right thing to do," she said.
Scott declined further comment. Right, it's the right thing to do to let the council select your replacement, rather than the voters.........not.
Gonzales said she didn’t want to correct the mayor during the meeting and continue a discussion among Council members about Scott’s replacement before she had had a chance to discuss the issue with Meyers. Again, is this lying by omission? As a member of the council, Straub was entitled to an honest answer from Gonzales who works for the council. Is she the one to decide if a discussion should continue? Believe that is beyond her scope of responsibility. And she says she didn't discuss it with the mayor beforehand? Huh??? And if not, why not?? As contentious as this item has become one would think that as soon as Gonzales got the letter she would have notified the mayor? She sat on it instead? Please, get me that towel!!!!!
Scott was first elected to the Council in 2004 and was re-elected in 2008. She has been involved within the community with the Sister City Committee, Old Shawnee Days, the Shawnee Great Grillers Barbeque Contest, and the Irish-American and German-American Clubs. OK
Controversy over Scott’s possible resignation arose in late January. Ward I resident Carri Donohoe Person and her attorney came to a Council meeting the day before the deadline to file as a candidate for the April Council elections and asked Scott to resign her seat.
Person said she had learned Scott planned to move to Arizona and that she had sold her Shawnee home in late December. Person said Scott should resign, allowing the Council to vote to put the seat on the ballot for April’s Council elections so voters could choose Scott’s replacement.
At the time, Scott said she would not resign until she changed her address. Marvin Rainey, city attorney, said city ordinances would not allow the Council to put the seat on the April ballot, even if Scott had resigned prior to the filing deadline. But what if she had resigned in November with a delayed date? The city could have notiffed JoCo elections that by the time of the April election the seat would be open. Considering that the Shawnee City Clerk notarized some of the purchase documents for her new home, common sense tells you it would be obvious that a move was in the works. Get me that towel....please.
In addition to giving up her Council seat, Scott indicated she was resigning from her positions on the Johnson County Solid Waste Management Committee and the Shawnee Convention and Visitors Bureau. Her last Council meeting will be April 12, which will be the same meeting Council members elected in the April 6 elections will be sworn in. OK
The resignation puts into effect the process of appointing a replacement Council member to fill out Scott’s current term, which expires in April 2012. The Council has 60 days to fill the vacancy before the city would be required to hold a special election. They don't have to appoint a replacement, they can let it go to the voters.
The replacement must be nominated by a Council member and approved by the majority of the remaining Council members.
Gonzales said the 60 days would begin the day Scott’s resignation is effective. Gonzales said the city would ask Ward I residents to send letters of interest to become Scott’s replacement, and those who applied would be interviewed at a Council meeting before a replacement is appointed.
"I would anticipate that will happen in early May," she said.
